Re: [M100] Yeah im an idiot

Well, unless someone makes a weird feature request I think the hard parts are done. I just need to grind through m100.def and make all the wrapper functions. I suppose I should test them, too :-) This is probably one of the largest and least compatible Small C libraries ever. I don't know

Re: [M100] Yeah im an idiot

Cheer up, Willard. Been there, done that. More than once... :( On 3/23/17, Willard Goosey wrote: > Doesn't help when I get all obsessed with something. I was all "it's a > pointer it must be declared as such" > > Anyway that's most of a day's hacking wasted. At least rcs

Re: [M100] Yeah im an idiot

Doesn't help when I get all obsessed with something. I was all "it's a pointer it must be declared as such" Anyway that's most of a day's hacking wasted. At least rcs is over its mad Willard Sent from Samsung tablet Original message From "John R. Hogerhuis"

Re: [M100] Yeah im an idiot

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Willard Goosey wrote: > > John you're right i'm an idiot > > Extern char CSRX is the right thing. > > > Are you sure you want me writing the compiler's library? :-( > > Willard > Sent from Samsung tablet > We all make those kinds of mistakes.

[M100] Yeah im an idiot

John you're right i'm an idiot  Extern char CSRX is the right thing. Are you sure you want me writing the compiler's library? :-( Willard Sent from Samsung tablet

Re: [M100] Smallc tech note

Yeah, sorry... I'd been hacking on that all day with no success, and was more than a little cranky. Let me try again: The global absolute label CSRX=0xF63A is the address of the X co-ordinate of the cursor on the screen. ("Im picking on it because it's the first variable to appear in m100.def.) 

Re: [M100] Smallc tech note

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Willard Goosey wrote: > > And I really really hoped that the system variables would be as easily > used. Unfortunately it's not to be. A reference to extern char *CRSX > (x=CRSX) generates "lhld CRSX \n mov a,m" when what I need is "lxi h, >

Re: [M100] So this happened

I'm not likely to make it to SoCal any time soon, but Ottawa's a lot closer (or maybe you'll find yourself in Toronto some day...) Hope to meet one fine day... m - Original Message - From: Stephen Adolph To: Model 100 Discussion Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 1:50 AM

Re: [M100] Smallc tech note

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Willard Goosey wrote: > G!!! > > Ok, so. My m100.def has, for SmallC purposes, 3 classes of equates. ROM > function that don't require arguments or return values, ROM functions that > do require args or return values, and system

Re: [M100] Smallc tech note

G!!! Ok, so. My m100.def has, for SmallC purposes,  3 classes of equates. ROM function that don't require arguments or return values, ROM functions that do require args or return values, and system variables. Because I use sed to translate the ASM/ZMAC original equates into ASX syntax