[M100] QUAD BOM

2017-09-10 Thread Brian White
Hey Steven, I think I worked up a DigiKey cart to build 3 QUADs, the version on osh park now. 2 things I'm not sure about: The text on oshpark says it needs a BAV70, but it looks like there are footprints for 2 BAV70's on that version of the board. I assume I should I install 2? The exact

Re: [M100] Does anybody backtrack VARPTR results?

2017-09-10 Thread Willard Goosey
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 16:34:00 + "John R. Hogerhuis" wrote: > So maybe you just need to use the unused struct somehow? You could > use it in a cast and see if that works around. Doesn't allocate space. The plot thickens! I found the compiler guy's test suite, which includes

Re: [M100] Inaugural Tandy Assembly in Chillicothe, Ohio 7-8 October 2017 -- who is going?

2017-09-10 Thread John W. Linville
Awesome -- I look forward to meeting you! John On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 10:37:04AM +1200, Philip Avery wrote: > Me, me! I'm making the trip from New Zealand. But I won't be the furthest > travelled, one is coming from Australia. > If all goes well between now & then in my development dept, I'll

Re: [M100] Does anybody backtrack VARPTR results?

2017-09-10 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
So maybe you just need to use the unused struct somehow? You could use it in a cast and see if that works around. Doesn't allocate space. But if you have a test case maybe upstream will just fix it for you. -- John.

Re: [M100] Does anybody backtrack VARPTR results?

2017-09-10 Thread Willard Goosey
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 22:50:33 -0700 "John R. Hogerhuis" wrote: > That's a bummer. > > Funny what people leave out of a C-ish implementation. The > preprocessor has to be one of the easiest pieces. Obviously the preprocessor hasn't been really been expanded on since the days this