[M100] M100 CP/M is alive

2020-06-12 Thread Philip Avery
Those who have signed up for a REXCPM board may like to check out this wiki page on M100 CP/M: http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=M100_CP/M It has all the info for installing CP/M, special features, importing software, etc. I look forward to seeing what CP/M applications become

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Stephen Adolph
Doug, I took a good look at the situation, and attempted to bend pins such that I could make it work, but unfortunately ... I can't. REXCPM is much taller than REX, and so there is less height to play with and still be able to close the hatch cover. REXCPM is also a touch wider, to fit into the

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Jim Anderson
> -Original Message- > > I see no reason for rexcpm to be limited to 6.2. A real drive isn't, and > it's a pretty easy change for the few tpdd servers that are current. I don't think anybody is suggesting this is going to be a permanent situation. Remember that this is all still under

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 3:19 PM John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:52 PM Brian White wrote: > >> If you've already broken compatibility in other ways for the speed, then >> what's the argument anyway? >> >> I see no reason for rexcpm to be limited to 6.2. A real drive

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:52 PM Brian White wrote: > If you've already broken compatibility in other ways for the speed, then > what's the argument anyway? > > I see no reason for rexcpm to be limited to 6.2. A real drive isn't, and > it's a pretty easy change for the few tpdd servers that are

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Brian White
If you've already broken compatibility in other ways for the speed, then what's the argument anyway? I see no reason for rexcpm to be limited to 6.2. A real drive isn't, and it's a pretty easy change for the few tpdd servers that are current. Rexcpm already breaks compatibility all kinds of

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Bert Put
Also, I'm not concerned about the 8.3 vs. 6.2 filename format since that is no more difficult to manage than I have now with the NADSBox. So it's a non-issue for me. Regards,Bert On 6/12/20 4:23 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:01 PM Brian White

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Stephen Adolph
standard LaddieAlpha works fine for me, just have to in the near term work around the 6.2 and 8.3 file name format. no biggie. On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 5:22 PM Tom Dison wrote: > What kind of term/comm program are you including with CP/M? > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020, 4:18 PM Stephen Adolph wrote:

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:01 PM Brian White wrote: > TPDD protocol supports 8.3. > There is no reason I see the tpdd code in rexcpm can't do tpdd with full > native filenames, if full native filenames are only 8.3. > True but none of the TPDD services were designed to support the new 8.3 use

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Tom Dison
What kind of term/comm program are you including with CP/M? On Fri, Jun 12, 2020, 4:18 PM Stephen Adolph wrote: > it is an issue for LaddieAlpha, Nadsbox and other clients to ensure > support for that. Has nothing to do with REXCPM. REXCPM is a piece of > hardware. > > CP/M contains 2

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Stephen Adolph
it is an issue for LaddieAlpha, Nadsbox and other clients to ensure support for that. Has nothing to do with REXCPM. REXCPM is a piece of hardware. CP/M contains 2 utilities for reading and writing to TPDD. CP/M is 8.3. The client has to "not choke" on 8.3. On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 5:01 PM

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Brian White
TPDD protocol supports 8.3. There is no reason I see the tpdd code in rexcpm can't do tpdd with full native filenames, if full native filenames are only 8.3. -- bkw On Fri, Jun 12, 2020, 2:48 PM Stephen Adolph wrote: > the only caveat is that NADSbox,LaddieAlpha etc are 6.2 format and CPM is

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Bert Put
Thanks Steve, that is perfect! That right there makes it far more usable than the "proprietary format -> CP/M disk image -> text file" solution. I just realized that the wiki at http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=M100_CP/M exists and if I was paying attention, I would have got my answer

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Stephen Adolph
the only caveat is that NADSbox,LaddieAlpha etc are 6.2 format and CPM is 8.3 format. So right now you need to adjust the file names to go through a 6.2 transfer mechanism, and correct it on the other end. On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:47 PM Stephen Adolph wrote: > TPDD protocol, direct files

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Stephen Adolph
TPDD protocol, direct files usable on PC. Same model as M100, identical. cheers Steve On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:41 PM Bert Put wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Yes, I mean the CP/M RAM disk, for want of a better word :-) > Does that mean that the files are transferred to SDCard (I have a > NADSBox) as

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Bert Put
Hi Steve, Yes, I mean the CP/M RAM disk, for want of a better word :-) Does that mean that the files are transferred to SDCard (I have a NADSBox) as plain files that I could then read on my PC? I'm contrasting with the SD card floppy emulation on my Kaypro 2X which stores almost proprietary

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Stephen Adolph
Bert, by "the disk" you mean the CP/M storage? Yes, Philip has utilities for import and export. TPDD based ..Steve On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:32 PM Bert Put wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Just one last question: Does REXCPM allow you to preserve any file on > the disk to another physical disk using

Re: [M100] REXCPM orders.

2020-06-12 Thread Bert Put
Hi Steve, Just one last question: Does REXCPM allow you to preserve any file on the disk to another physical disk using NADSBox, LaddieAlpha, or similar TPDD software? If not, how would you recommend achieving that? Thank you! Regards,Bert On 6/9/20 10:04 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: >