Re: [M100] Since we are playing guess the project...

> I checked that website out ... The interface isn't very clear on what I > should push. User friendly is not one of their strong points; they skimp on UX and pass the savings on to you! > Is this your website, or were you plugging it for someone else? Not my site, but got our alien flight

Re: [M100] Since we are playing guess the project...

I recently found my new favorite ribbon for the bottom, right at a Target. 9/16" wide, and thinner and smoother than the 3/8" I was using. The tape sticks better to it because it's flatter. The only thing is it would rather catch fire than melt when you try to fuse the cut edges. So I have to

Re: [M100] Since we are playing guess the project...

Hey Lee, I checked that website out ... seems fairly hard to understand how to submit a board for quote. The interface isn't very clear on what I should push. Is this your website, or were you plugging it for someone else? Also, I tried to submit an STL file for a 3D printing quote, but

Re: [M100] Since we are playing guess the project...

Hey Brian, Thanks, we'll see if they work soon enough I suppose. I also put a couple of capacitor population options on the bottom of the board with different CAP height possibilities. The idea being that with proper component selection, no added filler / spacer should be required below

Re: [M100] Since we are playing guess the project...

I dunno but I like your half-holes better than the figtronix ones. The less-than-half arc, the small square pads, and the insulating space between the closest point between pads. -- bkw On Jul 17, 2017 7:56 PM, "Ken Pettit" wrote: > Toying around with the idea. Just

Re: [M100] Since we are playing guess the project...

Plug for dirtypcbs.com, super cheap, fast, and swank custom board colors. Here's my bro assembling a nifty super thin yellow PCB for a micro-quad. Birth of AlienFlight - YouTube On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Ken Pettit wrote:

[M100] Since we are playing guess the project...

Toying around with the idea. Just ordered 3 of these from OSHPark ... boards due in a week or so. Ken

Re: [M100] A little side project...

Ah in that case I see how it doesn't really have a place in this table. I don't have a wp2 myself and wasn't aware of that. On Jul 17, 2017 3:15 PM, "Gary Weber" wrote: It was my impression that the WP2 code base for its system ROM isn't directly based off of the original

Re: [M100] A little side project...

Yes it has a Z80, which is a super-set of the 8080 (and has quite a few additional instructions actually), but departs from the 8085. (Try to use RIM/SIM on a Z80 and you go to never-never land) Yes, CP/M iI think would be quite possible given the WP-2 RAM architecture. On Mon, Jul 17, 2017

Re: [M100] A little side project...

Doesn't the WP2 use a Z80? Might have some incompatibilities there since it has some instructions not present in the 8085. Now, if you wanted to port CP/M to it... ;-) m - Original Message - From: Gary Weber To: m...@bitchin100.com Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 3:15 PM

Re: [M100] A little side project...

> Though it would be nice if we had a disassembly of the wp-2 and entrypoints. I'm sure something could be done for this. I can add an "architecture" field that would provide a filter that could allow representation of WP-2 entrypoints and keep them separate from the general KYO architecture

Re: [M100] A little side project...

Right the WP-2 codebase is unrelated to the Microsoft BASIC ROM base of the Model T. Though it would be nice if we had a disassembly of the wp-2 and entrypoints. Btw are you going to make your web page smart enough to generate include files? -- John.

Re: [M100] 8201A NiCd

The switches both check out. I feel like I'm running out of simple solutions. On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Jason Benson wrote: > That sounds worth trying, a switch is easy enough to fix or replace. > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 3:17 PM, John Gardner

Re: [M100] A little side project...

It was my impression that the WP2 code base for its system ROM isn't directly based off of the original Kyocera architecture and therefore I wasn't considering including it. Can someone clarify? Also yes the NEC 8201A and 8300 ROM entry points and upper RAM area are equivalent for development

Re: [M100] Off-the-Shelf AC Adapter for M100?

Thanks guys! I just ordered the Digikey one. Provided I don't kill my 100 when I attempt the NiCd replacement I should be set! On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 1:01 PM, wrote: > I ordered a couple of these from Digkey.com for both my Tandy 200 and > Tandy PDD. > >

Re: [M100] A little side project...

wp2? All nec are the same? On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Gary Weber wrote: > John, you're too quick. ;-) > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 7:25 PM, John R. Hogerhuis > wrote: > >> Looks like creating the backing store for a community managed cross >>