On 3/28/2017 4:24 PM, Daren Schwenke wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 5:10:57 PM UTC-4, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
> I saw the Hackaday post...congratulations!
>
> ...and nothing in the press is ever really all that correct. Just be
> glad they didn't (mis)quote you and the
There was a good amount of interest in Machineface and in velocity
extrusion.
I often switched between 40mm/sec and 180mm/sec during a print to showcase
how you can do that and it still works right. Thank you Bas and
Alexander...
I would of course eventually run out of cooling at 180mm/sec
On 3/28/2017 3:40 PM, Daren Schwenke wrote:
> Oh yeah... Featured on hackaday:
> http://hackaday.com/2017/03/26/mrrf-17-true-color-3d-printing/
> When I saw this I immediately tried to get him to correct some things. Not
> mentioning Machinekit was one of them, getting all the names wrong was
> On 28 Mar 2017, at 22:40, Daren Schwenke wrote:
>
> Oh yeah... Featured on hackaday:
> http://hackaday.com/2017/03/26/mrrf-17-true-color-3d-printing/
> When I saw this I immediately tried to get him to correct some things. Not
> mentioning Machinekit was one of
Oh yeah... Featured on hackaday:
http://hackaday.com/2017/03/26/mrrf-17-true-color-3d-printing/
When I saw this I immediately tried to get him to correct some things. Not
mentioning Machinekit was one of them, getting all the names wrong was
another. He hasn't done it yet.
On Sunday, March
When I've run into people who have been using Machinekit in the wild, there
is often the perception that it's 'slow'.
This is of course directly related to the GPU issue causing software
rendering and the subsequent pegged main CPU but the average user
summarizes the experience based on it.
So