Re: OT: Revealed Email Passwords???

2004-04-05 Thread Brian McNett
On Saturday 03 April 2004 08:42, gohaku wrote: My question, is using Earthlink's webmail just as secure as the SSL Connection and why was Daniel's log in and password revealed??? Daniel was using a wireless connection. Wireless connections are easilly sniffed. As this is offtopic for the

Re: ANNOUNCE: Affrus 1.0 - a Perl Debugger

2004-03-11 Thread Brian McNett
On Thursday 11 March 2004 10:57, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Anyone with admin powers able to pull this clown from the list. Commercial adverts. Seriously. No place for them here. Seconded. Way too much like spam. There are ways to properly plug your product on a discussion list. This is

Re: ANNOUNCE: Affrus 1.0 - a Perl Debugger

2004-03-11 Thread Brian McNett
On Thursday 11 March 2004 12:09, Jason FB wrote: As someone who is relatively new to this list this experience has been very edifying. I would ask two theoretical questions: 1. How do we approach this situation with compassion for all of the parties involved? 2. How do we set limits to the

Re: Using challenge-response systems for mailing lists

2004-01-23 Thread Brian McNett
On Friday, January 23, 2004, at 06:46 AM, Chris Devers wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, David Cantrell wrote: Amusingly, this message also triggered the broken software. Funny, my message yesterday didn't trigger it. Maybe it's someone that just subscribed? That or someone just thinks you're

Re: OT: Virus warning

2004-01-18 Thread Brian McNett
On Sunday, January 18, 2004, at 09:58 PM, Chris Nandor wrote: I don't know who is being targetted, but I got a ton from Matthias and Jarkko (about 50 between the two addresses). My boss got a copy which had a forged from of [EMAIL PROTECTED]. They look like junk faxers, which is neither here

Re: OT: Virus warning

2004-01-18 Thread Brian McNett
On Sunday, January 18, 2004, at 10:34 PM, Brian McNett wrote: The rest of this is phenomenally boring, unless you do it for pay, so at this point I return you to your regularly scheduled Mac OS X Perl discussion. Oh... Symantec is calling it [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Just discovered today. http

Re: Still no joy in Mudville. (update: JOY JOY JOY!! HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY!!)

2002-09-24 Thread Brian McNett
[piping the solution back to the list...] On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 02:03 PM, Chris Angelli wrote: % cd /Library/Perl % find . -name *.bundle -print Again, I don't want to waste your time, but I banged my head against this one for a few days before it worked, so I'm just trying

Still no joy in Mudville.

2002-09-23 Thread Brian McNett
I've struck out. I'm still getting the following undefined symbols from Perl 5.8: dyld: perl Undefined symbols: _Perl_sv_2pv _perl_get_sv Trace/BPT trap Also discovered the following when attempting to run another program: dyld: perl Undefined symbols: _Perl_safefree _Perl_safemalloc

Re: Perl 5.8.0 on MacOS X 10.2 (problems)

2002-09-22 Thread Brian McNett
On Sunday, September 22, 2002, at 02:55 AM, ellem wrote: Do you have FINK installed? Do a google on FINK Perl or look in this list this has been discussed and the answers are in here. 1) Yes I have fink installed 2) No, that does not appear to be the problem. The solution to the fink

Perl 5.8.0 on MacOS X 10.2 (problems)

2002-09-21 Thread Brian McNett
Okay, I followed the instructions at: http://developer.apple.com/internet/macosx/perl.html to the very best of my ability, and now I'm stuck. As I read the instructions, I see: If, after the installation, you get warnings about missing symbols, you probably have an old version of

Re: Why do the Docs say download binaries, don't compile ?

2002-09-18 Thread Brian McNett
On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 09:39 AM, ellem wrote: In conclusion OS X is =~ UNIX and you should look around this list for all the instructions regarding the installation of 5.8.0 I'm rather surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet, but there is an EXCELLENT article on installing

Re: Non-CPAN modules??

2002-09-11 Thread Brian McNett
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 07:02 AM, Steven Bach wrote: I grabbed the tarball to take a look at it. The INSTALL file say you have to hand modify the Makefile to get it to point to where you want. Since there are only seven files, there is no compile involved, and it is

Non-CPAN modules??

2002-09-10 Thread Brian McNett
Okay, I'm in stupid question mode, so I'll keep this short. I'm working on ways to track spam (where most people just want to filter it), and looking around noticed a nifty bit of Perl code which appears to do most of what I want, and could easily be coerced into doing the rest as well...

Storable.pm?

2002-09-08 Thread Brian McNett
Okay, I'm only asking this question here because I've thouroughly exhausted all the available resources and can't find an answer. There's probably a FAQ somewhere and I've missed it. I had thought that Storable was part of the standard Perl 5.6 distro, and can't seem to locate it under MacOS

Re: Storable.pm?

2002-09-08 Thread Brian McNett
On Sunday, September 8, 2002, at 09:08 PM, Chris Devers wrote: Pick one: % sudo perl -MCPAN -e 'install Storable' % sudo fink install storable-pm The former is maybe the standard way to do it for most Perl ports, but if you've got Fink on your Mac then the latter is nice too.

Re: Meeting notice

2002-09-07 Thread Brian McNett
On Saturday, September 7, 2002, at 06:09 PM, Sherm Pendley wrote: The above address in the Return-Path header looks suspect, as it's neither Lincoln's nor yours. The owner of this address may not be sending this stuff out intentionally, however - they could be infected by an Outlook

Re: socket

2002-03-14 Thread Brian McNett
On Thursday, March 14, 2002, at 12:49 PM, bob ackerman wrote: perlipc doc has sample for doing a socket: use IO::Socket; $remote = IO::Socket::INET-new( Proto= tcp, PeerAddr = localhost,

Re: Apache on a G4

2002-03-12 Thread Brian McNett
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 01:22 PM, Morbus Iff wrote: MacPerl is for the Classic / OS 9 and below environment. MacPerl allows you to reach out into the normal Finder and create Mac GUIs, or else interact with AppleScript and so on and so forth. The Perl shipped with OS X is the

Re: Namespace [Was: Re: MacOSX::File]

2002-01-14 Thread Brian McNett
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 09:42 AM, Chris Nandor wrote: I wonder if maybe we should have Carbon:: or Cocoa:: namespaces? Even Mac::Carbon:: or Mac::Cocoa:: or Mac::Aqua:: etc. This would be Mac::Carbon::Something in that case ... I haven't weighed in on this issue (or much of

Re: Bouncing spam

2001-12-21 Thread Brian McNett
On Friday, December 21, 2001, at 03:43 AM, Sean wrote: It depends on whether the spammer is removing people who bounced as dead addresses. In my experience doing network abuse investigation, the SINGLE most universal and ubiquitous problem, even among legitimate mailers is lack of proper