On 2002.02.05, at 07:38, Mark Edwards wrote: > I've also noticed that some of the directory sizes do not match between > the psync copy and the original. > > This may be due to .* files not being copied, but in one case the > directory was actually larger in the copy than in the original, despite > containing fewer items (no .* files)
This one I don't quite understand. On HFS+ directory size Always appears 0 (in blocks. Though ls -l shows something different). Maybe this is due to the fact that psync always copies finfo of the directory as well. Remeber on HFS+ directory is not a distinct file like UFS. Directory is just a catalog entry so the very size of the directory seems irrelevant. Well, I don't know what 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 dankogai dankogai 24 Feb 5 08:26 foo/ ^ This is # of blocks it takes. ^^This figure exactly mean myself. Because no matter how large a directory is, the number of blocks it actually takes is always 0 (or it is part of the catalog). Dan
