Hi all,
Thanks for all you input. I'm mulling it all over to decide what works
best for me. That's the beauty of it all - there's always more than one
way to get what you want. Thanks again.
Mark
On Feb 18, 2005, at 11:37 AM, Rich Morin wrote:
At 8:39 AM -0800 2/18/05, Mark Wheeler wrote:
Is it
Which reminds me... I've been using the #!/usr/bin/env
perl shebang for easier distribution, but env doesn't
like switches. Is there a way to set taint mode via
`use` or the like (ala use warnings; for -w). I can't
seem to locate anything in the manuals other than the
-T flag.
Correct me if I'm
On Feb 19, 2005, at 1:51 AM, wren argetlahm wrote:
Which reminds me... I've been using the #!/usr/bin/env
perl shebang for easier distribution, but env doesn't
like switches. Is there a way to set taint mode via
`use` or the like (ala use warnings; for -w).
No. By definition, any switch in the
On 2005.2.19, at 01:39 AM, Mark Wheeler wrote:
Hi,
Just a quick question. Is it possible to have a bunch of variables in
a separate file and then require that file in the script file? Let me
give you and example.
--
Script file
At 4:54 pm + 18/2/05, Neil Bowers wrote:
You'll need to declare the variable in the script ('our', not 'my'),
before you require variables.conf
I don't think it needs to be before;
for (our @list) { print }
will do the trick.
JD
On 2005-02-18 Mark Wheeler wrote:
Ok... I made the changes, but still no luck. Here is the script as it
is, now.
--
test.cgi
--
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
our @list;
require 'variables.conf';
foreach (@list)
On Feb 18, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Mark Wheeler wrote:
Hi,
Just a quick question. Is it possible to have a bunch of variables in
a separate file and then require that file in the script file?
It's generally not a wise choice. Better to use something like
Data::Dumper to write the data to a file,
--- Bruce Van Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And you will avoid the stress of combing back
through a program you need
to make secure, trying to find the elusive points
where the -T switch
tenaciously challenges you, an enterprise in which
you may risk losing
your appreciation of logically
