Re: Is there a True Boolean type in Perl?

2007-10-16 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> ""Chas" == "Chas Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: "Chas> On 10/15/07, Michael Barto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As both Java and Javascript both have a 'true' and 'false' or Boolean data >> type, is >> there any interest in evolution of Perl to have a true Boolean. Or what is >> the >>

Re: Leopard Perl version...

2007-10-16 Thread Edward Moy
On Oct 16, 2007, at 3:56 AM, David Cantrell wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:32:09AM -0700, Edward Moy wrote: So software updates are restricted to keep the size down. Because most users do not use the command-line or develop software, updates to command-line programs never make the cut

Re: Re: Leopard Perl version... @ 1192462023

2007-10-16 Thread Doug McNutt
At 15:29 +0100 10/16/07, David Cantrell wrote: >The one I'm most looking forward to is perl being relocatable. Current >versions of perl have the values for @INC hard-coded into the binary at >compile-time. You can add to @INC in perl 5 by defining an environment variable PERL5LIB.. If you defin

Re: Is there a True Boolean type in Perl?

2007-10-16 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:27:26PM -0700, Michael Barto wrote: > As both Java and Javascript both have a 'true' and 'false' or Boolean > data type, is there any interest in evolution of Perl to have a true > Boolean. Or what is the preferred method to do this in Perl. The place to discuss this

Re: Re: Leopard Perl version... @ 1192462023

2007-10-16 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 05:28:48PM +0200, Johan Meskens CS3 jmcs3 wrote: > > I *wish* it was 5.10 as that has some > > very nice features that I am excited about. > like what for example ? The one I'm most looking forward to is perl being relocatable. Current versions of perl have the values for

Re: Leopard Perl version...

2007-10-16 Thread Joel Rees
On 平成 19/10/16, at 19:56, David Cantrell wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:32:09AM -0700, Edward Moy wrote: So software updates are restricted to keep the size down. Because most users do not use the command-line or develop software, updates to command-line programs never make the cut

Re: Leopard Perl version...

2007-10-16 Thread David Cantrell
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:32:09AM -0700, Edward Moy wrote: >So software updates are restricted to keep the size down. > Because most users do not use the command-line or develop software, > updates to command-line programs never make the cut (developer > software has it own update

Re: Is there a True Boolean type in Perl?

2007-10-16 Thread Chas. Owens
On 10/15/07, Doug McNutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 18:20 -0700 10/15/07, Michael Barto wrote: > >I think in the more newer languages, they have implemented true booleans. > >Perl > >is kind of old school. > > use constant TRUE => 1; > use constant FALSE => 0; > > Is a complete solution in pe

Re: Is there a True Boolean type in Perl?

2007-10-16 Thread Chas. Owens
On 10/15/07, Michael Barto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think in the more newer languages, they have implemented true booleans. > Perl is kind of old school. Pascal defines them as a grandfather of > languages. > Therefore as one migrates the languages to a higher levels (e.g. Perl[n]), >