On Feb 15, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Michael Hall wrote:
> Meanwhile, I was still thinking about grabbing the source and setting up
> something on github with a dylib/jar pair that developers could add to their
> projects
> to get this scripting engine without hacking JDK/JRE's. Seem a reasonable
> i
On Feb 15, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 15/02/2014 14:27, Michael Hall wrote:
>> :
>> Sorry Scott, put you in Led Zeppelin there for a bit. Except for Scott's
>> 1.7.0_51, his and Alan's look to be later versions, so we might assume more
>> recent builds have this fixed?
>>
> I
If I don't define JAVA_HOME I automatically get the latest jdk when I run
commands. Something is handling that. I think it is the commands that are
linked to - they don't run java 6 automatically.
Scott
On Feb 15, 2014 1:01 PM, "Michael Hall" wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Scott Palmer
On Feb 15, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Scott Palmer wrote:
>
> Maybe, but I don't think so. I think that stuff is part of the magic that
> makes JAVA_HOME work without messing around with the path.
>
It looked like most of the java commands default link to the Apple Java 6
versions.
I set up this in m
On Feb 15, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Scott Palmer wrote:
> Maybe, but I don't think so. I think that stuff is part of the magic that
> makes JAVA_HOME work without messing around with the path.
>
> I think OpenJDK has a JIRA bug system now, but the usual place at oracle.com
> still works.
>
> Scott
On Feb 15, 2014 11:10 AM, "Michael Hall" wrote:
> I think that may also explain my remaining jrunscript problem.
> ls -l /usr/bin/jrunscript
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 80 Mar 12 2013 /usr/bin/jrunscript ->
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/Current/Commands/jrunscript
> I wil
On 15/02/2014 14:27, Michael Hall wrote:
:
Sorry Scott, put you in Led Zeppelin there for a bit. Except for Scott's
1.7.0_51, his and Alan's look to be later versions, so we might assume more
recent builds have this fixed?
I took a quick poke around and I now see that the reason AppleScript is
On Feb 15, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 15/02/2014 14:27, Michael Hall wrote:
>> :
>> Sorry Scott, put you in Led Zeppelin there for a bit. Except for Scott's
>> 1.7.0_51, his and Alan's look to be later versions, so we might assume more
>> recent builds have this fixed?
>>
> I
On Feb 15, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Michael Hall wrote:
> I have had partial success on this based on this Stack Overllow post…
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10054252/trying-to-use-rhino-getenginebynamejavascript-returns-null-in-openjdk-7
>
Sorry again, one more correction, based on this URL…
ht
On Feb 15, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Michael Hall wrote:
> I'm not sure if Robert Palmer and Alan Bateman somehow just missed out on
> this problem or had a easier or better solution? If so I'd be interested in
> hearing it.
Sorry Scott, put you in Led Zeppelin there for a bit. Except for Scott's
1.7
I have had partial success on this based on this Stack Overllow post…
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10054252/trying-to-use-rhino-getenginebynamejavascript-returns-null-in-openjdk-7
I had updated my _40 era jdk build to a nice new 1.7.0_51-b13 which had
unfortunately done me no good.
So I add
On 14/02/2014 21:17, Michael Hall wrote:
On Feb 13, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Michael Hall wrote:
Is the AppleScript engine no longer not even the default one but no longer
shipped?
Not seeing a reply here.
Is there a more appropriate forum for OS X specific java questions now?
I just checked my lo
On Feb 14, 2014, at 9:23 PM, Scott Palmer wrote:
> $ jrunscript -q
> Language AppleScript 2.3 implementation "AppleScriptEngine" 1.1
> Language ECMAScript ECMA - 262 Edition 5.1 implementation "Oracle Nashorn"
> 1.8.0
Thanks, not sure why it doesn't show for me then but thanks.
I'll verify App
$ jrunscript -q
Language AppleScript 2.3 implementation "AppleScriptEngine" 1.1
Language ECMAScript ECMA - 262 Edition 5.1 implementation "Oracle Nashorn"
1.8.0
I have Apples, latest Java 6 runtime as well as JDK 1.7.0_51 and JDK 1.8.0
b129 installed. Based on the "Oracel Nashorn" 1.8.0, I woul
On Feb 14, 2014, at 5:47 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
>
> What Java version are you testing?
Command line I show...
/usr/libexec/java_home --exec java -version
java version "1.7.0_40"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_40-b43)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.0-b56, mixed mode
> Is the AppleScript engine no longer not even the default one but no longer
> shipped?
> My HalfPipe application has some launch dependencies on it being there. It
> was throwing NPE's apparently not getting the engine.
> I stuck in some code to list out available engines and get…
What Java ve
On Feb 13, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Michael Hall wrote:
> Is the AppleScript engine no longer not even the default one but no longer
> shipped?
Not seeing a reply here.
Is there a more appropriate forum for OS X specific java questions now?
Michael Hall
trz nio.2 for OS X http://www195.pair.com/mik3
On Feb 13, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Michael Hall wrote:
> Is the AppleScript engine no longer not even the default one but no longer
> shipped?
> My HalfPipe application has some launch dependencies on it being there. It
> was throwing NPE's apparently not getting the engine.
> I stuck in some code to
18 matches
Mail list logo
