Could you review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8040291/webrev.02/
- The isRVObserevr typo is fixed
On 5/20/2014 7:32 PM, Petr Pchelko wrote:
Could you review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8040291/webrev.01
- The getRVSize() method from the
Could you review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8040291/webrev.03/
- The test checks that the resolution-variant observer is called at
least once.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 5/21/2014 2:50 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Could you review the updated fix:
http://cr.
Hello, Alexander.
The fix looks good.
With best regards. Petr.
On 21 мая 2014 г., at 17:47, Alexander Scherbatiy
wrote:
>
> Could you review the updated fix:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8040291/webrev.03/
>
> - The test checks that the resolution-variant observer is called at lea
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> I have to admit that this makes me very sad. I work in an academic
> environment (read: financially restricted unless you happen to work on the
> NIH campus in DC) where upgrading is often simply not an option.
Yes, this is very sad. The whole premise of "WORA" is b
