Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-10-16 Thread Conrad Schilbe
To clear up any confusion for others that may pick up this thread, my previous email stated that a patch should not be made to perl sources... I mistook the details below as implying that each perl module (i.e. DBD::mysql) be patched for an error in the Config.pm module. In actuality, I believe,

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-10-15 Thread Conrad Schilbe
Mike, I was encountering the same errors as you in my quest to install DBD::mysql and discovered that under the following setup: Custom installed Perl 5.8.1 RC3 - No multi-threading ggc 2.95 - via /usr/sbin/gcc_select 2 Removing /sw/lib/perl5/Storable.pm /sw/lib/perl5/auto/Storable I was

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-10-15 Thread Edward Moy
We recently discovered the DBD::mysql problem as well. The patch is to edit /System/Library/Perl/5.8.1/darwin-thread-multi-2level/Config.pm, replacing: ld='MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 cc' with ld='env MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 cc' Unfortunately, this change is too late to get into

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-10-15 Thread David Wheeler
On Wednesday, October 15, 2003, at 04:58 PM, Edward Moy wrote: We recently discovered the DBD::mysql problem as well. The patch is to edit /System/Library/Perl/5.8.1/darwin-thread-multi-2level/Config.pm, replacing: ld='MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 cc' with ld='env

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-10-15 Thread Edward Moy
In hints/darwin.sh, replace *) ld=MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 ${ld} ;; with *) ld=env MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 ${ld} ;; Hopefully, this will go into 5.8.2. Ed On Oct 15, 2003, at 5:05 PM, David Wheeler wrote: On Wednesday, October 15, 2003, at 04:58 PM, Edward Moy wrote: We

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-10-15 Thread Conrad Schilbe
Edward, I edited /System/Library/Perl/5.8.1/darwin-thread-multi-2level/Config.pm, switched perl back to the apple install and had no problems building DBD::mysql. Your information is greatly appreciated! c On 10/15/03 5:58 PM, Edward Moy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We recently discovered the

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-10-15 Thread Conrad Schilbe
I would think this should stay out of the perl sources since it is not a bug of perl's... Thoughts? I also just discovered that this fixes a build problem with Data::Dumper... Or so it would appear. It's possible this will effect several packages. The patch should not be put in all the perl

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Schienle
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 8:35 AM, Mike Schienle wrote: On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 7:28 AM, John Delacour wrote: At 4:09 pm -0600 7/8/03, Mike Schienle wrote: I'm having some trouble with DBI and DBD::MysqlPP (and DBD::MySQL) on 10.3. Can I get a sanity check response that some people

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Whittle
Does this mean that the version of perl installed on Panther will not support DBI and DBD::MySQL? That would be a real pain. On Friday, Aug 8, 2003, at 15:28 Europe/Madrid, John Delacour wrote: At 4:09 pm -0600 7/8/03, Mike Schienle wrote: I'm having some trouble with DBI and DBD::MysqlPP

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Schienle
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 7:28 AM, John Delacour wrote: At 4:09 pm -0600 7/8/03, Mike Schienle wrote: I'm having some trouble with DBI and DBD::MysqlPP (and DBD::MySQL) on 10.3. Can I get a sanity check response that some people are able to run one of these? 10.3 is not that important for

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-08-10 Thread Mike Schienle
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 10:07 AM, Robert Whittle wrote: Does this mean that the version of perl installed on Panther will not support DBI and DBD::MySQL? I wouldn't try to read into my situation too much. I'm also using MySQL Alpha release 4.1.x. So, an alpha DB on a beta OS. I think I

Re: DBI and DBD::MySQL (Panther)

2003-08-08 Thread John Delacour
At 4:09 pm -0600 7/8/03, Mike Schienle wrote: I'm having some trouble with DBI and DBD::MysqlPP (and DBD::MySQL) on 10.3. Can I get a sanity check response that some people are able to run one of these? 10.3 is not that important for what I'm working on, but MySQL is, so I can roll back to