Re: [MacPerl] Syntax check question

2001-02-22 Thread Jan Erik Moström
On 2001-02-22 at 16:18, Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nothing will be exported into JEM::Info::PairParse unless you include it in > @EXPORT (or ask for it explicitly, etc.). So unless you have something > like @EXPORT = @Jem::Util::EXPORT in JEM::Error ... Aha, I'll have to fix this

Re: [MacPerl] Syntax check question

2001-02-22 Thread Chris Nandor
At 21:56 +0100 2001.02.22, Jan Erik Moström wrote: >On 2001-02-22 at 14:50, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I assume these modules have "package" statements that you haven't shown >> here. You should put the package declarations before any "use" >> statements. That way when "use" im

Re: [MacPerl] Syntax check question

2001-02-22 Thread Jan Erik Moström
On 2001-02-22 at 14:50, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I assume these modules have "package" statements that you haven't shown > here. You should put the package declarations before any "use" > statements. That way when "use" imports symbols into the current > namespace (package), it

Re: [MacPerl] Syntax check question

2001-02-22 Thread Ken Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Erik Moström) wrote: >-- module A --- > >use B; >use C; > >-- module B --- > >use C; > >-- module C --- > >-- > >If I now do a syntax check I get error messages that the functions of C are >redefined ... I assume this is because C is first checked/compiled in the use >statem