At 11:17 Uhr -0500 25.11.2001, Chris Nandor wrote:
>At 07:44 -0800 2001.11.25, Adam Russell wrote:
>>So, to be perfectly clear when someone reads an archived copy of this(>:),
>>there is no way to express the time in milliseconds in versions of Macperl
>>earlier than 5.6.1 ?
>
>There could be. So
At 19:23 +0100 2001.11.27, Thomas Wegner wrote:
>But maybe it's easier, when Adam upgrades to MacPerl 5.6.1? ;-)
That's my vote. :)
--
Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
indeed, I was unable to use the above for this until MacPerl 5.6.1 came
along. I finally got some tuits and added the code but I suspect it's
still not as efficient as it *could* be, though I feel I got pretty
darned close. There is some overhead associated with the process in any
case, so I'm
>At 11:17 Uhr -0500 25.11.2001, Chris Nandor wrote:
>>At 07:44 -0800 2001.11.25, Adam Russell wrote:
>>>So, to be perfectly clear when someone reads an archived copy of this(>:),
>>>there is no way to express the time in milliseconds in versions of Macperl
>>>earlier than 5.6.1 ?
>>
>>There could
