Re: Problem with the repository: bogus date

On Sep 3, 2007, at 18:51, Rainer Müller wrote: Vincent Lefevre wrote: I've noticed the following error: $ svn log -r2 https://svn.macosforge.org/repository/macports svn: Bogus date It is really a "Bogus date", as you can see in the following log: --snip-- | $ svn log --xml -r2 https://svn

Re: Newbie Port Creator Questions

On 2007-09-04 00:38:15 +0200, Rainer Müller wrote: > GPLv2 is not necessarily incompatible with GPLv3. It is. > GPL lets the original author choose how new versions apply to the > software. See paragraph 9 of the GPLv2 [1]. > > --snip-- > | Each version is given a distinguishing version number.

Re: Missing tickets

On Sep 3, 2007, at 8:37 PM, Randall Wood wrote: I recently had a ticket that I was not being listed in Trac, #11903. Changing its priority from "Expected" to "Normal" solved the problem. I wonder how many other tickets have invalid priorities since the change in Trac priority values? U

Missing tickets

I recently had a ticket that I was not being listed in Trac, #11903. Changing its priority from "Expected" to "Normal" solved the problem. I wonder how many other tickets have invalid priorities since the change in Trac priority values? Randall Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://shyramblings.b

Re: Man pages / Doc strategy

Weissmann Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Having only one place for documentation sounds great! I suppose >regenerating the manpages for every release only could be sufficient. Yes I suppose so. I was forgetting that if hte man pages were in DocBook, there would be two regens; one for the h

Re: Problem with the repository: bogus date

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I've noticed the following error: > > $ svn log -r2 https://svn.macosforge.org/repository/macports > svn: Bogus date It is really a "Bogus date", as you can see in the following log: --snip-- | $ svn log --xml -r2 https://svn.macosforge.org/repository/macports | | | |

Problem with the repository: bogus date

I've noticed the following error: $ svn log -r2 https://svn.macosforge.org/repository/macports svn: Bogus date -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Are

Re: Newbie Port Creator Questions

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > AFAIK, the BSD license allows you to create a derived work that would > be distributed under the GPL. Owning the original source is necessary > only if you want to change the license in an incompatible manner (e.g. > you created a work which you distributed under the GPLv2

Re: Problem with patchfiles (same name for different versions)

On 2007-09-03 12:18:29 -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I also don't know if patchfiles/distfiles can be renamed after > download. In the absence of that feature, I recommend: > > dist_subdir ${name}/${version} > > (Instead of the default dist_subdir ${name}) Thanks, this solves the problem. -- Vinc

Re: [28562] trunk/dports

Weissmann Markus: BTW; Syntax errors in Portfiles are detected by "port lint" I suppose this only is in trunk so far? Yes, that is correct. Trac and Trunk (1.6.0). --anders ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http:

Re: [28562] trunk/dports

On 03.09.2007, at 22:30, Anders F Björklund wrote: Weissmann Markus wrote: Hey, thanks a lot for fixing my typos! That was really quick! :) BTW; Syntax errors in Portfiles are detected by "port lint" I suppose this only is in trunk so far? -Markus --- Markus W. Weissmann http://www

Re: Portfile Pillow Fight

Ryan Schmidt wrote: ---> Verifying Portfile for sleepwatcher Warning: Line 40 has trailing whitespace before newline Warning: Line 46 has trailing whitespace before newline ---> 0 errors and 2 warnings found. I wish to have that whitespace there and do not want port lint to complain about i

Re: [28562] trunk/dports

Weissmann Markus wrote: Hey, thanks a lot for fixing my typos! That was really quick! :) BTW; Syntax errors in Portfiles are detected by "port lint" --anders ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforg

Re: [28562] trunk/dports

Hey, thanks a lot for fixing my typos! That was really quick! :) -Markus On 03.09.2007, at 21:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Revision 28562 Author [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date 2007-09-03 12:52:23 -0700 (Mon, 03 Sep 2007) Log Message fix syntax errors introduced in recent configure.env cleaning Mod

Re: zsh and zsh-devel

On 2007-09-03 12:22:17 -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > What portname suffix would you propose instead of "-devel"? "-devel" seems > ok to me -- it indicates that this will install the version currently being > developed by the developers, as opposed to the version that is stable and > has already b

Re: Wormux homepage links to darwinports.com

On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:16 AM, N_Ox wrote: Le 3 sept. 07 à 03:07, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : On Sep 2, 2007, at 11:46, N_Ox wrote: Just a little mail to say that someone should contact the wormux staff and tell them that darwinports.com's owner is an obnoxious dwarf and that they should not l

Re: zsh and zsh-devel

On Sep 3, 2007, at 08:47, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2007-09-02 22:40:01 +0200, Anders F Björklund wrote: N_Ox wrote: zsh is now quite old and its maintainship has been dropped. I'm the current maintainer of zsh-devel and I think it does not deserve its -devel nature. Should we delete zsh

Re: Problem with patchfiles (same name for different versions)

On Sep 3, 2007, at 09:48, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2007-09-03 16:39:35 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Upstream patches are versioned: they are in different subdirectories. But MacPorts doesn't care, unless I've missed something to have the subdirectory taken into account. Also, I tried spec

Infrastructure requests

Hello all! I recently created a page listing what I believe are the top priority infrastructure requests we have for our Mac OS Forge host, http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/wiki/InfrastructureRequests Per the introductory text in there: "When thinking about a f

Re: Binutils installation problem

On 03/set/07, at 06:57, Paul Guyot wrote: Chiara should either remove FSF compiler and retry or try to compile an FSF-obtained version of binutils. Unfortunately no solution works properly. ::. Using gcc 4.0.1 of Apple and installing binutils through macport, I have the following error -

Re: Problem with patchfiles (same name for different versions)

On 2007-09-03 16:39:35 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Upstream patches are versioned: they are in different subdirectories. > But MacPorts doesn't care, unless I've missed something to have the > subdirectory taken into account. Also, I tried specifying the directory after patchfiles, but "port"

Re: Problem with patchfiles (same name for different versions)

On 2007-09-03 16:20:04 +0200, Anders F Björklund wrote: > N_Ox wrote: >>> Usually the patch files are overwritten along with the Portfile. >>> So you have one set of Portfile + files for each version/release. >>> And when you add the new distfile for the new version of the port, >>> the old distfil

Re: Doc directory (was: [28480] trunk/dports/archivers/p7zip)

On 2007-09-03 15:57:47 +0200, N_Ox wrote: > Recent autotools-based package doc directories default to > ${name}-${version} (see libogg and libvorbis). But why did they do such a change? Note that this is a setting that comes from these particular packages, not from the autotools: libogg-1.1.3/do

Re: Problem with patchfiles (same name for different versions)

N_Ox wrote: The problem is that patches are not stored in a subdirectory that depends on the version. So, there is a clash if I want to declare patch01 as a new patchfile for mpfr-2.3.0. What is the recommended solution? Usually the patch files are overwritten along with the Portfile. So you h

Re: Problem with patchfiles (same name for different versions)

Le 3 sept. 07 à 15:29, Anders F Björklund a écrit : Vincent Lefevre wrote: The problem is that patches are not stored in a subdirectory that depends on the version. So, there is a clash if I want to declare patch01 as a new patchfile for mpfr-2.3.0. What is the recommended solution? Usually

Re: Newbie Port Creator Questions

On 2007-09-03 00:27:44 +0200, Weissmann Markus wrote: > The thing with GPLed code is, that it is viral, so everything you > link against it (or mix with it) will get GPLed code, too. I'm not > quite sure what if you do not own the original source (e.g. it is > BSD licensed), but I assume that every

Re: Doc directory (was: [28480] trunk/dports/archivers/p7zip)

Le 3 sept. 07 à 15:25, Vincent Lefevre a écrit : On 2007-09-01 07:28:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Changed doc directory to ${name}-${version}. I don't know if there has been a discussion about this, but is there any reason to include the version, given the fact that two different ve

Re: zsh and zsh-devel

On 2007-09-02 22:40:01 +0200, Anders F Björklund wrote: > N_Ox wrote: > >> zsh is now quite old and its maintainship has been dropped. >> I'm the current maintainer of zsh-devel and I think it does not deserve >> its -devel nature. >> Should we delete zsh and rename zsh-devel? > > Upstream still l

Re: Problem with patchfiles (same name for different versions)

Vincent Lefevre wrote: The problem is that patches are not stored in a subdirectory that depends on the version. So, there is a clash if I want to declare patch01 as a new patchfile for mpfr-2.3.0. What is the recommended solution? Usually the patch files are overwritten along with the Portfil

Doc directory (was: [28480] trunk/dports/archivers/p7zip)

On 2007-09-01 07:28:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > * Changed doc directory to ${name}-${version}. I don't know if there has been a discussion about this, but is there any reason to include the version, given the fact that two different versions cannot be activated at the same time? I find

Problem with patchfiles (same name for different versions)

MacPorts stores patchfiles in /opt/local/var/macports/distfiles/${name} e.g. /opt/local/var/macports/distfiles/mpfr contains here: -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 787634 2007-07-24 16:10:58 mpfr-2.2.1.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 872947 2007-08-29 15:38:57 mpfr-2.3.0.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 1

Re: xfig

Hi Sebastian, Does the xfig fix work for you? David 2007/8/30, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Aug 29, 2007, at 11:27, Sebastian Sandersius wrote: > > > On 8/26/07, Sebastian Sandersius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> It seems that xfig crashes with macports now. I don't know if its >

Re: Man pages / Doc strategy

On 03.09.2007, at 11:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Weissmann Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Why isn't configure.env supported anymore? oops - sorry, my fault! I really wanted to say: Using configure.env directly should be avoided - we do have a nice set of commands for setting the most us

Man pages / Doc strategy

Weissmann Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Why isn't configure.env supported anymore? >> > >oops - sorry, my fault! I really wanted to say: >Using configure.env directly should be avoided - we do have a nice >set of commands for setting the most used flags at configuration >time. If you ca

Re: Wormux homepage links to darwinports.com

Le 3 sept. 07 à 03:07, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : On Sep 2, 2007, at 11:46, N_Ox wrote: Just a little mail to say that someone should contact the wormux staff and tell them that darwinports.com's owner is an obnoxious dwarf and that they should not link it [1]. [1] http://www.wormux.org/wik