Re: Google SoC 2008

2008-03-02 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
On Mar 2, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Randall Wood wrote: > I would like to see MacPorts use RPM for its installation database > instead of whatever we have now. We don't have anything now. We've also tried to use rpm at various times in the past, but the impedance matching requirements have always p

Re: Google SoC 2008

2008-03-02 Thread Blair Zajac
Randall Wood wrote: > On 3/2/08, Eric Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:48:56PM -0800, James Berry wrote: >> > I'm writing to attempt to gauge interest in whether and how MacPorts >> > should participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) for 2008. See >> http://code.goo

Re: Google SoC 2008

2008-03-02 Thread Randall Wood
On 3/2/08, Eric Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:48:56PM -0800, James Berry wrote: > > I'm writing to attempt to gauge interest in whether and how MacPorts > > should participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) for 2008. See > http://code.google.com/soc/2008/ > > . >

Re: Google SoC 2008

2008-03-02 Thread Eric Hall
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:48:56PM -0800, James Berry wrote: > I'm writing to attempt to gauge interest in whether and how MacPorts > should participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) for 2008. See > http://code.google.com/soc/2008/ > . > > You might be inclined to address any of the followin

Re: Checking if a given port is installed in pre-fetch

2008-03-02 Thread Adam Mercer
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Daniel J. Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can do almost anything from within a portfile, but there are lots > of things that you maybe shouldn't. > > What are you trying to accomplish? I want to upgrade the science/geos port to 3.0.0 but matplotlib-basema

Re: Checking if a given port is installed in pre-fetch

2008-03-02 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 1, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Adam Mercer wrote: > Is there a way that I can check if a given port is installed in a > pre-fetch phase and display a message, e.g. using ui_msg, if the port > is installed? You can do almost anything from within a portfile, but there are lots of things that you ma

Re: RFC: Changing apache2 to install its files to /opt/local/ instead of /opt/local/apache2

2008-03-02 Thread Rainer Müller
js wrote: >> Before anyone does anything, I'd like to know why you want this >> change. > > Consistency, period. > When I upgraded from apache1 to apache2, it surprized me that > there is no conf dir in /opt/local/etc and apachectl is in > /opt/local/apache2/bin/. I agree. Even more, the current

Re: RFC: Changing apache2 to install its files to /opt/local/ instead of /opt/local/apache2

2008-03-02 Thread js
> Before anyone does anything, I'd like to know why you want this > change. Consistency, period. When I upgraded from apache1 to apache2, it surprized me that there is no conf dir in /opt/local/etc and apachectl is in /opt/local/apache2/bin/. > Let's figure out the pros and cons. > > A con woul