Hi, great work Simon!
For doing this automatically (e.g. every night),
we could need some kind of shell (bash) script doing this. Do you think
thats possible for fully automation?
Kind regards
Thomas
Simon Ruderich wrote:
[...]
> Hi all,
> sorry for the late reply.
>
> I just created a chunked
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 02:46:33PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Hey guys!
>>
>>The guide is advancing so nicely that I'm afraid we've hit the
>> point when it's maybe becoming a tad too large for a single page, wouldn't
>> y'all think?
>>
>>Every time I have to load a s
Hi Daniel,
On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Adam Mercer wrote:
>> Failed to parse file lang/ghc/Portfile: Error evaluating variants
>
> It's because portindex runs on a 10.5 ppc machine, and the ghc port
> specifically errors out on that platform.
Hi Adam,
On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Adam Mercer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Gregory Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I checked in a version bump of ghc to 6.8.2 yesterday. The portfile
>> is in the svn
>> repo, but someone emailed me to say that it did not a
On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Adam Mercer wrote:
Failed to parse file lang/ghc/Portfile: Error evaluating variants
It's because portindex runs on a 10.5 ppc machine, and the ghc port
specifically errors out on that platform.
I've checked in an update that wraps the error return in a pre-fetch
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Gregory Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I checked in a version bump of ghc to 6.8.2 yesterday. The portfile
> is in the svn
> repo, but someone emailed me to say that it did not appear in their
> dports tree.
> I notice as well that it is missi
Hi,
I checked in a version bump of ghc to 6.8.2 yesterday. The portfile
is in the svn
repo, but someone emailed me to say that it did not appear in their
dports tree.
I notice as well that it is missing from the "available ports" on the
web page.
Did something go awry or should just advi
Thanks to everybody who pitched ideas for GSoC 2008.
Now the rubber needs to meet the road. We need:
- Somebody to head up our GSoC 2008 effort (get us signed up with
Google, document the proposed projects, etc).
- And committed mentors for any projects.
Volunteers?
As Paul Gu
js wrote:
> I wrote the Filename hierarchy standard for MacPorts.
> I know there's already porthier(7), but I thought it would be nice
> to have more specific standard.
So is this meant to replace porthier(7)? Than you should write it up as
a patch for the manual page. I don't think we need yet a
js wrote:
>> Do you mean dbmmanage.1{apache,apache20,apache2}.gz? That would be good.
>> Then you can read the man pages by using e.g. man 1apache2 dbmmanage.
>
> I feel a bit odd, though.
> I prefer python's style.
> - /opt/local/share/man/man1/python2.5.1.gz
> - /opt/local/share/man/man1/p
js wrote:
> I am really like to hear from all of you.
> Any comments, suggestions and even critique would be appreciated.
...
> Everything installed by MacPorts must be in /opt/local or
> /Applications/MacPorts. The former is used for non-aqua applications
> and may be changed by modifying macpor
Hi,
I wrote the Filename hierarchy standard for MacPorts.
I know there's already porthier(7), but I thought it would be nice
to have more specific standard.
As you can see, this standard is still incomplete intentionally,
becauses this kind of task should be not done in solely and
I'd like to chec
Then, is my request rejected?
Who has the power to decide this kind of issue?
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 29, 2008, at 14:33, Kevin Ballard wrote:
>
> > On Feb 29, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 29, 2008, at 09:20, js w
> >> The apache port should be able to coexist with either the apache2 or
> >> the apache20 port. Currently, they cannot coexist:
> >>
> >> $ sudo port activate apache
> >> Password:
> >> ---> Activating apache
> >> Error: port activate failed: Image error: /opt/local/share/man/man1/
On 2/29/08, James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm writing to attempt to gauge interest in whether and how MacPorts
> should participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) for 2008. See
> http://code.google.com/soc/2008/
> .
>
> You might be inclined to address any of the following questions
On 2/29/08, James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm writing to attempt to gauge interest in whether and how MacPorts
> should participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) for 2008. See
> http://code.google.com/soc/2008/
> .
>
> You might be inclined to address any of the following questions
16 matches
Mail list logo
