Re: RFC: Support for future compilers in base

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 18, 2013, at 23:27, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > On Feb 18, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > >> I don't think return is behaving like you (or I) expect. > > The following is somewhat academic, but some might find it instructive. And > it will almost certainly make Jeremy h

Re: RFC: Support for future compilers in base

2013-02-18 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Feb 18, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > I don't think return is behaving like you (or I) expect. The following is somewhat academic, but some might find it instructive. And it will almost certainly make Jeremy hate Tcl more than he already does. The Tcl "return" command[1] tak

Re: [MacPorts] #36459: doxygen @1.8.1: graphiz dependency problem?

2013-02-18 Thread Eric A. Borisch
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2013, at 18:32, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > > > On Feb 18, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt > wrote: > > > >> On Feb 18, 2013, at 14:26, Lawrence Velázquez > wrote: > >> > >>> Why does doxygen have a dependency on graphviz, anywa

Re: [103053] trunk/dports/net/zabbix2/Portfile

2013-02-18 Thread Eric A. Borisch
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Eric A. Borisch wrote: > > > On Monday, February 18, 2013, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> >> On Feb 18, 2013, at 12:00, ebori...@macports.org wrote: >> >> > Revision: 103206 >> > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/103206 >> > Author: ebori...@macports.org >>

Re: [103204] trunk/dports

2013-02-18 Thread Eric A. Borisch
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:09, ebori...@macports.org wrote: > > > +variant mpich2 requires mpich description {Variant renamed as +mpich} {} > > You should use "Legacy compatibility variant" as the description in these > cases. > > Done. r103217.

Re: [103053] trunk/dports/net/zabbix2/Portfile

2013-02-18 Thread Eric A. Borisch
On Monday, February 18, 2013, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2013, at 12:00, ebori...@macports.org wrote: > > > Revision: 103206 > > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/103206 > > Author: ebori...@macports.org > > Date: 2013-02-18 10:00:16 -0800 (Mon, 18 Feb 2013) > > Log Mess

Re: [103206] trunk/dports/net/zabbix2/Portfile

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 18, 2013, at 12:00, ebori...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 103206 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/103206 > Author: ebori...@macports.org > Date: 2013-02-18 10:00:16 -0800 (Mon, 18 Feb 2013) > Log Message: > --- > zabbix2[-agent]: Upgrade to 2.0.5; Update depe

Re: [103195] trunk/dports/shells/luash

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 18, 2013, at 03:46, and.dam...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 103195 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/103195 > Author: and.dam...@macports.org > Date: 2013-02-18 01:46:43 -0800 (Mon, 18 Feb 2013) > Log Message: > --- > port luash: fixed master_sites, added mode

Re: [102933] trunk/dports/x11/rxvt-unicode/Portfile

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 18, 2013, at 19:08, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > On Feb 18, 2013, at 16:57, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Feb 18, 2013, at 18:44, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia >> wrote: >> >>> On Feb 16, 2013, at 03:42, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> On Feb 10, 2013, at 20:04, jerem...@macports.org

Re: [102933] trunk/dports/x11/rxvt-unicode/Portfile

2013-02-18 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Feb 18, 2013, at 16:57, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2013, at 18:44, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia > wrote: > >> On Feb 16, 2013, at 03:42, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >>> On Feb 10, 2013, at 20:04, jerem...@macports.org wrote: >>> Revision: 102933 https://trac.macports.or

Re: RFC: Support for future compilers in base

2013-02-18 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Feb 18, 2013, at 7:28 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > You'll get: > > ~/src/macports/dports/x11/xwininfo $ port lint > Can't map the URL 'file://.' to a port description file ("can't use empty > string as operand of "!""). > Please verify that the directory and portfile syntax are co

Re: [102933] trunk/dports/x11/rxvt-unicode/Portfile

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 18, 2013, at 18:44, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > On Feb 16, 2013, at 03:42, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Feb 10, 2013, at 20:04, jerem...@macports.org wrote: >> >>> Revision: 102933 >>>https://trac.macports.org/changeset/102933 >>> Author: jerem...@macports.org >>> Date

Re: [103204] trunk/dports

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:09, ebori...@macports.org wrote: > +variant mpich2 requires mpich description {Variant renamed as +mpich} {} You should use "Legacy compatibility variant" as the description in these cases. ___ macports-dev mailing list macports

Re: [102933] trunk/dports/x11/rxvt-unicode/Portfile

2013-02-18 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Feb 16, 2013, at 03:42, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Feb 10, 2013, at 20:04, jerem...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision: 102933 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/102933 >> Author: jerem...@macports.org >> Date: 2013-02-10 18:04:43 -0800 (Sun, 10 Feb 2013) >> Log Message: >> ---

Re: [MacPorts] #36459: doxygen @1.8.1: graphiz dependency problem?

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 18, 2013, at 18:32, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > On Feb 18, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Feb 18, 2013, at 14:26, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >> >>> Why does doxygen have a dependency on graphviz, anyway? I'm aware that >>> Doxygen can use Graphviz if it's available, >>

Re: [MacPorts] #36459: doxygen @1.8.1: graphiz dependency problem?

2013-02-18 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Feb 18, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Feb 18, 2013, at 14:26, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > >> Why does doxygen have a dependency on graphviz, anyway? I'm aware that >> Doxygen can use Graphviz if it's available, > > The second sentence is the answer to the first. Sure, but as

Re: RFC: Support for future compilers in base

2013-02-18 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Feb 18, 2013, at 16:19, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > > On Feb 15, 2013, at 14:11, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> I haven't actually tested this code but I'm sure a language like Tcl must >> support such a construct. But if you want to commit it as you sent it (but >> with Rainer's chang

Re: RFC: Support for future compilers in base

2013-02-18 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Feb 15, 2013, at 14:11, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I haven't actually tested this code but I'm sure a language like Tcl must > support such a construct. But if you want to commit it as you sent it (but > with Rainer's change) we can always refine it later. I beat my head against the keyboard tr

Re: [MacPorts] #36459: doxygen @1.8.1: graphiz dependency problem?

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 18, 2013, at 14:26, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > On Feb 18, 2013, at 9:18 AM, MacPorts wrote: > >> #36459: doxygen @1.8.1: graphiz dependency problem? >> --+ >> Reporter: philippe.lang@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… >>

Re: [MacPorts] #36459: doxygen @1.8.1: graphiz dependency problem?

2013-02-18 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Feb 18, 2013, at 9:18 AM, MacPorts wrote: > #36459: doxygen @1.8.1: graphiz dependency problem? > --+ > Reporter: philippe.lang@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… > Type: defect | Status: closed > Priority:

Re: new port submission

2013-02-18 Thread Alex Afanasyev
We have pretty long testing (since last September) of the port using our local repository: rsync://89.254.128.155/macports/. -- Alex On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:41 PM, "Andrea D'Amore" wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Francois Claire wrote: >> I'm interrested in testing ccnx, would be n

Re: [103156] trunk/dports/textproc/libxls/Portfile

2013-02-18 Thread Nicolas Pavillon
Hello, > This overwrites the default cflags. Is that what you want? The default for > configure.cflags is configure.optflags, whose default is -O2. So by > overwriting, you're no longer getting optimizations. You might want to append > to cflags to retain them instead. You are totally right,

Re: [103079] users/cal/base-sqlite-portindex/src/port1.0/portmain.tcl

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 16, 2013, at 11:01, Clemens Lang wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 03:45:34PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> portmain: define option procs without space at the end >> >> Why? We've been putting a space before the backslash everywhere else, >> except when that results in badness (i.e. in n

Re: [103165] trunk/dports/devel/fossil

2013-02-18 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2013-02-18 07:08, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2013, at 16:26, ciserl...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision: 103165 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/103165 >> Author: ciserl...@macports.org >> Date: 2013-02-16 14:26:55 -0800 (Sat, 16 Feb 2013) >> Log Message: >> -