Fwd: Any objections to removal of the carbon variant in py-wxpython-2.8?

2014-01-15 Thread Eric Gallager
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27, Eric Gallager wrote: > > > I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for > py-wxpython-2.8… > > Yes but would it be a problem for you to use the +gtk variant instead? If > so please explain. > > Oops,

Re: Any objections to removal of the carbon variant in py-wxpython-2.8?

2014-01-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27, Eric Gallager wrote: > I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for py-wxpython-2.8… Yes but would it be a problem for you to use the +gtk variant instead? If so please explain. ___ macports-dev mailing list ma

Re: Any objections to removal of the carbon variant in py-wxpython-2.8?

2014-01-15 Thread Eric Gallager
I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for py-wxpython-2.8... On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Hi, > > The port py-wxpython-2.8 currently supports two conflicting variants: >+carbon (32-bit Carbon-based wxWidgets) >+gtk (GTK-based wxWidgets) > >

Any objections to removal of the carbon variant in py-wxpython-2.8?

2014-01-15 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hi, The port py-wxpython-2.8 currently supports two conflicting variants: +carbon (32-bit Carbon-based wxWidgets) +gtk (GTK-based wxWidgets) On 10.6 the variant +carbon is the default one, while on 10.7 and later only +gtk can be used anyway. I would like to remove the variant "+carbon" be