On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27, Eric Gallager wrote:
>
> > I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for
> py-wxpython-2.8…
>
> Yes but would it be a problem for you to use the +gtk variant instead? If
> so please explain.
>
>
Oops,
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27, Eric Gallager wrote:
> I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for py-wxpython-2.8…
Yes but would it be a problem for you to use the +gtk variant instead? If so
please explain.
___
macports-dev mailing list
ma
I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for
py-wxpython-2.8...
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The port py-wxpython-2.8 currently supports two conflicting variants:
>+carbon (32-bit Carbon-based wxWidgets)
>+gtk (GTK-based wxWidgets)
>
>
Hi,
The port py-wxpython-2.8 currently supports two conflicting variants:
+carbon (32-bit Carbon-based wxWidgets)
+gtk (GTK-based wxWidgets)
On 10.6 the variant +carbon is the default one, while on 10.7 and
later only +gtk can be used anyway.
I would like to remove the variant "+carbon" be