On Monday February 23 2015 05:22:50 Mihai Moldovan wrote:
Please don't do this. Tracemode will shadow any files from packages not
explicitly listed as a dependency. Builds in tracemode will thus
fail/not recognize harfbuzz at all, even if it installed.
How can it do that without deactivating
On Feb 20, 2015, at 4:34 AM, petr 9...@ingv.it wrote:
I saw that in r132950 and r132951 you corrected the error I introduced
with r132349. Thanks for this and sorry for the extra effort!
No worries.
However, I would like to better understand what went wrong and how am
I supposed to act in
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:18 AM, René J.V. rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
How can it do that without deactivating everything that's not somehow a
dependency (and thus making it impossible to do anything while an install
is being done), or by duplicating potentially a huge portion of the entire
On Monday February 23 2015 09:19:35 Brandon Allbery wrote:
How can it do that without deactivating everything that's not somehow a
dependency (and thus making it impossible to do anything while an install
is being done), or by duplicating potentially a huge portion of the entire
MacPorts
On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:18 AM, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday February 23 2015 09:19:35 Brandon Allbery wrote:
How can it do that without deactivating everything that's not somehow a
dependency (and thus making it impossible to do anything while an install
is being
On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:18 AM, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
Ugh. Just make it optional (as in can be turned off), ok? ...
I don't see us ever making trace mode mandatory, but we would eventually like
to make it the default mode of operation. And if a port fails to build under
- On 23 Feb, 2015, at 23:34, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
It intercepts all (file open and similar) system calls and then checks against
the installed files database, possibly for each and every header file included
(which often means the same header file multiple times),
On Monday February 23 2015 11:00:43 Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
I don't see us ever making trace mode mandatory, but we would eventually like
to make it the default mode of operation. And if a port fails to build under
trace mode, we consider that a bug in the port.
Sure. As I said, I'd probably
On Mon, February 23, 2015 16:50, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
Sure. As I said, I'd probably appreciate for certain things, but not as a
mandatory feature.
I have a hunch that it'd add non-negligible overhead too, if it's to be
used in as many stages as possible.
As someone routinely using trace
On Monday February 23 2015 16:51:15 Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
As someone routinely using trace mode across 10.5 to 10.10, I've run into
no significant impacts. I greatly appreciate all it provides, and all
It intercepts all (file open and similar) system calls and then checks against
the
10 matches
Mail list logo
