On 7/15/15 6:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 15, 2015, at 4:53 PM, ebori...@macports.org wrote:
Revision
138675
Author
ebori...@macports.org
Date
2015-07-15 14:53:07 -0700 (Wed, 15 Jul 2015)
Log Message
gdmap: Update perl dependency to 5.22; change to a build-only dependency.
Rev-bump to upd
> On Jul 15, 2015, at 4:53 PM, ebori...@macports.org wrote:
>
> Revision
> 138675
> Author
> ebori...@macports.org
> Date
> 2015-07-15 14:53:07 -0700 (Wed, 15 Jul 2015)
> Log Message
>
> gdmap: Update perl dependency to 5.22; change to a build-only dependency.
> Rev-bump to update dependency re
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> On 15.07.2015 05:40 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> I'm still optimistic that someone will point out some useful trac
>> plugin to fix the "issue".
>
> Trac plugins need to be installed by the MacOS Forge Admins...
Yes, but let's forget about t
> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:24 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> * blair + geeklair.net:dluke
> * subversion-perlbindings-5.16
This can be removed from the list (uses the perl5 portgroup to generate one
port per perl version).
--
Daniel J. Luke
On 15.07.2015 05:40 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> I'm still optimistic that someone will point out some useful trac
> plugin to fix the "issue".
Trac plugins need to be installed by the MacOS Forge Admins... I'm still waiting
for https://trac.macports.org/ticket/40987 to land...
> After some more
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> On 15.07.2015 04:13 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> Is there any sane way to allow "silent changes" in tickets where
>> zillions of ports need to be changes (and lots of maintainers have to
>> be subscribed)?
>
> No, hence:
I'm still optimistic
On 15.07.2015 04:41 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> I think port:cpuid should be fine already, given how it depends on the 2 perl
> ports it requires for building:
> {{{
> depends_build port:p${perl5.major}-pathtools \
> port:p${perl5.major}-scalar-list-utils
> }}}
It will
> > * gmail.com:rjvbertin
> > * cpuid
I think port:cpuid should be fine already, given how it depends on the 2 perl
ports it requires for building:
{{{
depends_build port:p${perl5.major}-pathtools \
port:p${perl5.major}-scalar-list-utils
}}}
R.
_
On 15.07.2015 04:13 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Is there any sane way to allow "silent changes" in tickets where
> zillions of ports need to be changes (and lots of maintainers have to
> be subscribed)?
No, hence: a comment that is periodically updated (which is quiet when being
edited.)
Develope
Hi,
Is there any sane way to allow "silent changes" in tickets where
zillions of ports need to be changes (and lots of maintainers have to
be subscribed)?
I know I can do that in a comment, but then I will be the only one
with permissions to change that comment. Is there *any* was to allow
anyone
On 15.07.2015 03:24 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #48365: Ports should require perl5.22 instead of 5.16
pulseaudio: done r138665
Mihai
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
htt
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2015-7-15 18:07 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:49 AM, David Evans wrote:
>>> On 7/14/15 4:32 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
I second perl 5.22. And that we should only support the latest perl.
—Mark
>>>
>>>
On 2015-7-15 18:07 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:49 AM, David Evans wrote:
>> On 7/14/15 4:32 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>> I second perl 5.22. And that we should only support the latest perl.
>>>
>>> —Mark
>>
>>
>> Sounds good, Mark. I think that makes the vote 3 to 1 so
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:49 AM, David Evans wrote:
> On 7/14/15 4:32 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
>>
>> I second perl 5.22. And that we should only support the latest perl.
>>
>> —Mark
>
>
> Sounds good, Mark. I think that makes the vote 3 to 1 so that probably
> covers the majority of people who ar
14 matches
Mail list logo
