On Oct 26, 2015, at 7:22 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Monday October 26 2015 12:59:38 Rainer Müller wrote:
>
>> My idea of 'port dump' was to only output options with their values once
>> after parsing the Portfile.
>
> How would that be different from what `port info` does currently?
>
>>
On 2015-10-26 13:46, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2015-10-26 23:22 , René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>> On Monday October 26 2015 12:59:38 Rainer Müller wrote:
>>
>>> My idea of 'port dump' was to only output options with their values once
>>> after parsing the Portfile.
>>
>> How would that be different from w
On 2015-10-26 23:22 , René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Monday October 26 2015 12:59:38 Rainer Müller wrote:
>
>> My idea of 'port dump' was to only output options with their values once
>> after parsing the Portfile.
>
> How would that be different from what `port info` does currently?
The purpose o
On Monday October 26 2015 12:59:38 Rainer Müller wrote:
> My idea of 'port dump' was to only output options with their values once
> after parsing the Portfile.
How would that be different from what `port info` does currently?
> You can't get the value after a specific phase without execution of
On 2015-10-26 11:53, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Monday October 26 2015 11:06:13 Rainer Müller wrote:
>>
>> If we would want to dump all possible options, we also would need
>> to keep a list when they are defined. That would be necessary to be
>> added in port1.0/portutil.tcl.
>
> Yeah, I saw t
On Monday October 26 2015 11:06:13 Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> If we would want to dump all possible options, we also would need to
> keep a list when they are defined. That would be necessary to be added
> in port1.0/portutil.tcl.
Yeah, I saw that code, and wondered if there was a way around that n
On 2015-10-23 22:20, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Oct 23, 2015, at 3:02 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
>> I managed to extend the `port info` syntax so that it accepts `port
>> info --var foo` but of course ran into the issue that lots of
>> variables aren't known when the code is evaluated.
>>
>>