On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Chris Jones wrote:
> On 11/08/16 20:40, Fred Wright wrote:
[...]
> > Well, leaving something alone that's working just fine is hardly much of a
> > maintenance burden.
>
> On the other hand, whats the rationale for keeping 2.6, given 2.7 is the
> official upstream production v
On 11/08/16 20:40, Fred Wright wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
On Aug 10, 2016, at 5:21 PM, Fred Wright wrote:
I don't consider Python 2.6 to be "cruft". Developers need many
versions of Python installed for testing, and that includes any
packages that are also nee
Hello,
On 2016-08-10 17:23, Craig Treleaven wrote:
> Is it possible for a port to take different actions depending on
> whether the user has initiated ‘port install’ v. 'port mpkg’ (or
> ‘port mdmg’)?
Unfortunately, no, as all phases can be run individually. So up to the
destroot phase, there is
