Would someone be so kind to review (and commit)
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52075 ?
Thank you!
--
Björn Ketelaars
GPG key: 0x4F0E5F21
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mac
On Aug 24, 2016, at 3:06 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2016-08-23 19:13, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> I would prefer you work with the developers of the affected software
>> packages to get the necessary compatibility functions into their sources.
>> This will help all Snow Leopard users, not just th
On 2016-08-24 21:40, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> On 24.08.2016 09:36 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>> But those Perl ports are always leaves (w.r.t. `cpuid`) because they are
>> build dependencies. There's no need to revbump if you're just updating build
>> dependencies.
>
> Aren't build dependencie
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>
>> On 24.08.2016 09:36 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>>
>> But those Perl ports are always leaves (w.r.t. `cpuid`) because they are
>> build dependencies. There's no need to revbump if you're just updating build
>> dependencies.
>
> Aren'
On Wednesday August 24 2016 15:40:27 Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> > But those Perl ports are always leaves (w.r.t. `cpuid`) because they are
> > build dependencies. There's no need to revbump if you're just updating
> > build dependencies.
>
> To be more specific, there's no need to revbump if t
On 24.08.2016 09:36 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> But those Perl ports are always leaves (w.r.t. `cpuid`) because they are
> build dependencies. There's no need to revbump if you're just updating build
> dependencies.
Aren't build dependencies included in the DB? I typically run port_cutleaves
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 3:36 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> On Aug 24, 2016, at 3:05 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>>
>>> On 24.08.2016 09:02 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, cpuid only has a build dependency on 2 perl packages, so there's no
>>> need to reinstall the port when perl ch
On Wednesday August 24 2016 21:05:29 Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>Uhm but that won't lead to rebuilds...
But there's no need to rebuild here, just as there wouldn't be a reason to
rebuild if the perl packages were a runtime dependency.
>to make that perl package a leaf. It's not strictly required, bu
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 3:05 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>
>> On 24.08.2016 09:02 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>>
>> Also, cpuid only has a build dependency on 2 perl packages, so there's no
>> need to reinstall the port when perl changes.
>
> You can use the revbump to change the dependency to the
On 24.08.2016 09:02 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Wednesday August 24 2016 20:43:08 Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>
>> It will need a revbump once that's done, but otherwise yes.
>
> That shouldn't actually be necessary; "base" ought to track which PortGroup
> files a port depends on, so that portind
On Wednesday August 24 2016 20:43:08 Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>It will need a revbump once that's done, but otherwise yes.
That shouldn't actually be necessary; "base" ought to track which PortGroup
files a port depends on, so that portindex can parse them if any of those
dependencies change.
Als
On 24.08.2016 08:28 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #52081: Ports should require perl5.24 instead of 5.22
> Comment (by rjvbertin@…):
>
> Not that I can commit it anyway, but I had a look at my `port:cpuid`.
> Turns out it depends on `port:p${perl5.major}-foo` ; am I right that this
> means it'll transit
>>
>> Just another thought, the declaration could be in its own file,
>> referenced with the compile option -include in CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS, with
>> conditional #ifdef to add extern "C" for C++. The unused declaration
>> should not do any harm in other compile units. That way you could even
>> avoid g
>
> Just another thought, the declaration could be in its own file,
> referenced with the compile option -include in CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS, with
> conditional #ifdef to add extern "C" for C++. The unused declaration
> should not do any harm in other compile units. That way you could even
> avoid generat
Hello,
Could someone review (and commit) ticket #51448 ?
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51448
Thanks in advance.
Nico.
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
On 2016-08-24 02:14, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> Would someone be so kind to review (and commit)
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52066 ?
Done.
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/151932
Rainer
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge
On 2016-08-23 19:13, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I would prefer you work with the developers of the affected software packages
> to get the necessary compatibility functions into their sources. This will
> help all Snow Leopard users, not just those using MacPorts.
I agree that fixing bugs in upstre
17 matches
Mail list logo
