On 2013-3-26 00:51 , Eric A. Borisch wrote:
> It would be nice if 'sudo port upgrade' could detect something (in the
> general, not this particular) case like:
>
> NOTE: default variants for port "python" changed from "+eggs" to
> "+eggs+spam" since installed.
> Follow change of defaults [y/N]
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2013-3-26 00:27 , Joshua Root wrote:
> > On 2013-3-26 00:22 , Eric A. Borisch wrote:
> >> I've pondered ones like this one before. Shouldn't the binary packages
> >> be updated (and would they without the revbump)? Don't we want the
> >> bi
On 2013-3-26 00:27 , Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2013-3-26 00:22 , Eric A. Borisch wrote:
>> I've pondered ones like this one before. Shouldn't the binary packages
>> be updated (and would they without the revbump)? Don't we want the
>> binary to match (as close as possible) what would happen if someon
On 2013-3-26 00:22 , Eric A. Borisch wrote:
> I've pondered ones like this one before. Shouldn't the binary packages
> be updated (and would they without the revbump)? Don't we want the
> binary to match (as close as possible) what would happen if someone
> built from source? And related, if someon
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> > Revision: 104383
> > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/104383
> > Author: stromnov at macports.org
> > Date: 2013-03-24 04:29:11 -0700 (Sun, 24 Mar 2013)
> > Log Message:
> > ---
> > py-numpy: set default gcc47 vari
> Revision: 104383
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/104383
> Author: stromnov at macports.org
> Date: 2013-03-24 04:29:11 -0700 (Sun, 24 Mar 2013)
> Log Message:
> ---
> py-numpy: set default gcc47 variant, add gcc48 variant
>
> Modified Paths:
> --
> t
