> On Mar 6, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> On 6 March 2016 at 18:01, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>
>> We could remove all ports that depend on mysql4 and mysql5 exclusively or
>> via default variants. The remaining ports would then have their mysql4 or
>> mysql5
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> On 6 March 2016 at 18:01, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>
>> We could remove all ports that depend on mysql4 and mysql5 exclusively or
>> via default variants. The remaining ports would then have their mysql4 or
>> mysql5
On 6 March 2016 at 18:01, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> We could remove all ports that depend on mysql4 and mysql5 exclusively or
> via default variants. The remaining ports would then have their mysql4 or
> mysql5 variant removed.
>
> The removed ports could be brought back if someone was
> On Mar 5, 2016, at 3:39 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 3, 2016, at 12:14 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
>>>
>>> Bradley,
>>>
>>> I think you and I
> On Mar 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
>> On Mar 3, 2016, at 12:14 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
>>
>> Bradley,
>>
>> I think you and I already discussed this in some thread, but I can’t
>> remember right now…
>>
>> What’s the
> On Mar 3, 2016, at 12:14 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
>
> Bradley,
>
> I think you and I already discussed this in some thread, but I can’t remember
> right now…
>
> What’s the point of the mysql5 port now a-days? I’d say it’s redundant with
> mysql51, but not even,
Bradley,
I think you and I already discussed this in some thread, but I can’t remember
right now…
> Modified: trunk/dports/databases/mysql5/Portfile (146275 => 146276)
>
> --- trunk/dports/databases/mysql5/Portfile2016-03-03 06:16:58 UTC (rev
> 146275)
> +++ trunk/dport