Ryan,
> Was this change made inadvertently? It does not appear to relate to
> revbumping ports that depend on netcdf.
I tried to move any changes unrelated to netcdf away,
but I must have left this.
> If this is a change you want made, the port's revision should be increased,
> since it
> On Mar 26, 2016, at 4:44 AM, take...@macports.org wrote:
>
> Revision
> 147088
> Author
> take...@macports.org
> Date
> 2016-03-26 02:44:32 -0700 (Sat, 26 Mar 2016)
> Log Message
>
> rev bump ports that depend on netcdf. See #50911
> --- trunk/dports/gis/proj/Portfile2016-03-26 09:36:47