Re: [34368] trunk/dports/games/tuxmath/Portfile

2008-02-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
You need to bump the port revision too so everyone gets that change. On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Revision: 34368 http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/34368 Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2008-02-22 08:50:30 -0800 (Fri, 22 Feb 2008)

Re: [34368] trunk/dports/games/tuxmath/Portfile

2008-02-22 Thread Rainer Müller
Ryan Schmidt wrote: You need to bump the port revision too so everyone gets that change. I thought about that, but was uncertain if just this addition justifies a revision increment. Rainer ___ macports-dev mailing list

Re: [34368] trunk/dports/games/tuxmath/Portfile

2008-02-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 22, 2008, at 15:48, Rainer Müller wrote: Ryan Schmidt wrote: You need to bump the port revision too so everyone gets that change. I thought about that, but was uncertain if just this addition justifies a revision increment. If a different set of files ends up on the user's

Re: [34368] trunk/dports/games/tuxmath/Portfile

2008-02-22 Thread Rainer Müller
Ryan Schmidt wrote: If a different set of files ends up on the user's machine, the revision must be incremented. Otherwise some users with tuxmath 1.6.1_0 have one set of files and other users with 1.6.1_0 have a different set of files. That's not reliable; that's not reproducible. I