Re: KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

2016-04-10 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Saturday April 09 2016 12:47:09 René J.V. Bertin wrote: >On Thursday January 14 2016 00:54:59 ni...@macports.org wrote: Hi, Another heads-up : - I created a default +virtuoso variant for Soprano, which as far as I can see is required *only* if you actually want to use nepomuk other than to

Re: KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

2016-04-09 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Thursday January 14 2016 00:54:59 ni...@macports.org wrote: Hi Nicolas, Just a heads-up that I've pushed a few updates to my KDE4 ports, the most important ones being - updates to the latest kdelibs4 and kde4-runtime versions. Among the useful improvements that provides is the removal of

Re: [KDE/Mac] KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

2016-01-13 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Wednesday January 13 2016 10:53:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote: > Yes exactly, once an application has been released based on Qt5/KF5 it > shouldn't be coinstallable with the same application that is > Qt4/kdelibs4 based. Most (and eventually all) kf5 based applications Shouldn't, or isn't expected

Re: [KDE/Mac] KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

2016-01-13 Thread Jeremy Whiting
Yeah, not expected to be. If they are that's a bonus I guess, but not expected. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:05 PM, René J.V. wrote: > On Wednesday January 13 2016 10:53:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote: > >> Yes exactly, once an application has been released based on Qt5/KF5 it >>

Re: KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

2016-01-13 Thread nicos
Hello, > I'm sure you've noticed that I'm making progress with ports for KF5. Maybe I > should have asked your opinion on how to approach this (if so, apologies that > I didn't), but I would like to know your thoughts on the issue of > co-existence of KDE4 and KF5 ports. Yes, I saw the

Re: KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

2016-01-13 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Thursday January 14 2016 00:54:59 ni...@macports.org wrote: >It is not clear to me at this point what aim you have. Are you aiming for full >install (including applications) in parallel, or for non-conflicting core >packages so that different applications from both KDE4 and KF5 could be

Re: [KDE/Mac] KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

2016-01-13 Thread Jeremy Whiting
Hey, just some suggestions. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:54 AM, wrote: > Hello, > >> I'm sure you've noticed that I'm making progress with ports for KF5. Maybe I >> should have asked your opinion on how to approach this (if so, apologies >> that I didn't), but I would like to

Re: [KDE/Mac] KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

2016-01-13 Thread Jeremy Whiting
Yes exactly, once an application has been released based on Qt5/KF5 it shouldn't be coinstallable with the same application that is Qt4/kdelibs4 based. Most (and eventually all) kf5 based applications include a settings/config migrator that migrates settings from kdelibs4 locations to kf5

KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

2016-01-06 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Hello Nicolas, I'm sure you've noticed that I'm making progress with ports for KF5. Maybe I should have asked your opinion on how to approach this (if so, apologies that I didn't), but I would like to know your thoughts on the issue of co-existence of KDE4 and KF5 ports. KF5 is designed to

Re: [KDE/Mac] KDE4/KF5 "cohabitation"

2016-01-06 Thread Ian Wadham
Hi René and Nicolas and everybody, On 07/01/2016, at 1:44 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > I'm sure you've noticed that I'm making progress with ports for KF5. Yep. Good on yer, René! And it is nice to see that David Faure and other KDE core developers are taking an interest at last... > KF5 is