Blair Zajac wrote:
I was thinking that we should have a pre-commit script reject commits if a
portfile does not increment a revision or version if it changes any of its
depends_*. I find this pretty annoying to see commits that add a dependency
that don't bump a version or revision.
I
Rainer Müller wrote:
Blair Zajac wrote:
I was thinking that we should have a pre-commit script reject commits
if a portfile does not increment a revision or version if it changes
any of its depends_*. I find this pretty annoying to see commits that
add a dependency that don't bump
On Mar 7, 2008, at 12:24, Rainer Müller wrote:
Blair Zajac wrote:
If you have the base port installed, say libfoo, but it's not
listed as a
dependency, then if you remove it, then you'll unintentionally
break any ports
that picked up a dependency upon it at configure time.
Thanks for
Thanks for the clarification, I think you are kind of right. But it
will
always hit someone not affected by the update. For example, changing
depends_* inside some variants and incrementing the revsion forces all
users to recompile - even if they don't use this variant...
And yet,
