Re: [144607] trunk/dports/science/octopus/Portfile

2016-01-14 Thread David Strubbe
Ok, thanks for the explanation. And the fix to my logic in the Portfile. David On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2016, at 11:53 AM, David Strubbe wrote: > > > Oh ok. I have seen some ports have a revision increased recently because >

Re: [144607] trunk/dports/science/octopus/Portfile

2016-01-14 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 13, 2016, at 11:53 AM, David Strubbe wrote: > Oh ok. I have seen some ports have a revision increased recently because of a > change of default variants, so I was following that, but I guess they > shouldn't have been. It varies. You just need to ask yourself: will this change result

Re: [144607] trunk/dports/science/octopus/Portfile

2016-01-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 11:29 AM, dstru...@macports.org wrote: > > Revision > 144607 > Author > dstru...@macports.org > Date > 2016-01-13 09:29:21 -0800 (Wed, 13 Jan 2016) > Log Message > > octopus: Make +accelerate the default, to save a lot of time in building > atlas. > Modified Paths > >

Re: [144607] trunk/dports/science/octopus/Portfile

2016-01-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 13, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > But there was no reason to increase the port's revision, since the user's > existing variants will be preserved in the upgrade. Regardless whether the > user had the atlas or accelerate or openblas variant of octupus 5.0.1_0 > installed,

Re: [144607] trunk/dports/science/octopus/Portfile

2016-01-13 Thread David Strubbe
Oh ok. I have seen some ports have a revision increased recently because of a change of default variants, so I was following that, but I guess they shouldn't have been. David On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Ryan