Sorry I think I was confused. The ports are indeed uninstalled despite the
errors and warnings.
David
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
If they're not uninstalling that would be a bug in base. The files are
meant to be uninstalled and the registry entry
I tried it out, and it works partially. The PortGroup file I made in
_resources/port1.0/group/fortran-1.0.tcl is recognized when installing, but
not when uninstalling. For example:
$ sudo port uninstall libxc @2.0.2_0+gcc47
Warning: PortGroup fortran 1.0 could not be located. fortran-1.0.tcl does
dstru...@mit.edu writes:
I tried it out, and it works partially. The PortGroup file I made in
_resources/port1.0/group/fortran-1.0.tcl is recognized when installing, but
not when uninstalling.
Yep. I filed a bug long ago and tried to fix it:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34933
I see. As it stands, I am not sure how to actually uninstall the ports I
installed with the test portgroup -- they are still there after the failed
uninstall. Any tip?
David
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Sean Farley s...@macports.org wrote:
dstru...@mit.edu writes:
I tried it out, and
If they're not uninstalling that would be a bug in base. The files are
meant to be uninstalled and the registry entry removed regardless of
whether executing the portfile succeeds.
- Josh
On 2013-11-12 17:16 , David Strubbe wrote:
I see. As it stands, I am not sure how to actually uninstall the
On 2013-11-01 21:02, Dan Ports wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:21:36PM -0400, Eric Gallager wrote:
Really? That's strange, I could've sworn I was able to use the qmake
portgroup in my local PortFile repository successfully when I was testing
it...
I believe portfiles will use portgroups
On Nov 1, 2013, at 14:29, David Strubbe dstru...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to have local PortGroup files to use with a local Portfile
repository? If so, where should they be put? Or otherwise, how should one try
out a new PortGroup?
It’s a hidden directory at:
dports/_resources/
On Nov 1, 2013, at 13:29, David Strubbe wrote:
Is it possible to have local PortGroup files to use with a local Portfile
repository? If so, where should they be put? Or otherwise, how should one try
out a new PortGroup?
In my previous testing, I found that unfortunately no, portgroup files
Really? That's strange, I could've sworn I was able to use the qmake
portgroup in my local PortFile repository successfully when I was testing
it...
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
On Nov 1, 2013, at 13:29, David Strubbe wrote:
Is it possible to
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:21:36PM -0400, Eric Gallager wrote:
Really? That's strange, I could've sworn I was able to use the qmake
portgroup in my local PortFile repository successfully when I was testing
it...
I believe portfiles will use portgroups from their own repository, so
portgroups
On Nov 1, 2013, at 15:02, Dan Ports dpo...@macports.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:21:36PM -0400, Eric Gallager wrote:
Really? That's strange, I could've sworn I was able to use the qmake
portgroup in my local PortFile repository successfully when I was testing
it...
I believe
Someone, do a test!
On Nov 1, 2013, at 16:05, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
That was what I assumed would happen, but is not what I observed when I last
tried it.
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
