On 6/20/15 11:57 AM, "Marko Käning" wrote:
Hi Ryan,
If fixing those two ports is more complicated than just updating them to a
newer version, or copying an existing patch from upstream, then yes, it
would be fine to create an opencv2 port.
ok, I'll wait a bit until I have feedback from the dig
Hi Ryan,
> If fixing those two ports is more complicated than just updating them to a
> newer version, or copying an existing patch from upstream, then yes, it
> would be fine to create an opencv2 port.
ok, I'll wait a bit until I have feedback from the digikam developer, but
I have no idea about
On Jun 20, 2015, at 10:48 AM, Marko Käning wrote:
> Hi stromnov,
>
> recently opencv was updated from version 2 to 3, which left at least 2
> dependent
> ports in limbo [1,2] and there might be even more out there...
>
> I think this may ask for a new port opencv2, until its dependent ports ca
