Re: [32194] trunk/base/src/port1.0/portconfigure.tcl

Revision 32194 Author [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date 2007-12-19 06:44:11 -0800 (Wed, 19 Dec 2007) Log Message make the universal flags take the archs from a single source (thanks to ryandesign for the idea), enable 64 bit universal builds This change makes all +universal ports with an UI based on Car

Re: darwinports.com

Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: The matter should now rest since it's hard enough just enforcing your actual project name much less going after derivatives.  What next?  Someone could register any one of macosports.com, macosxports.com, macsoftwareports.com, etc etc (all of which are closer to macpor

Re: darwinports.com

On 8 Jan 2008, at 3:34 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote: Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: The matter should now rest since it's hard enough just enforcing your actual project name much less going after derivatives. What next? Someone could register any one of macosports.com, macosxports.com, macso

Re: [32194] trunk/base/src/port1.0/portconfigure.tcl

On 8 Jan 2008, at 09:34, Anders F Björklund wrote: Revision 32194 Author [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date 2007-12-19 06:44:11 -0800 (Wed, 19 Dec 2007) Log Message make the universal flags take the archs from a single source (thanks to ryandesign for the idea), enable 64 bit universal builds This chan

Re: libiconv

Peter, Does not have -I/opt/local/include Does have -L/opt/local/lib You are right. Thanks. There is an inconsistency. With MacPorts' iconv.h iconv_* are redefined to libiconv_*. I think I fixed the problem. I will upload the patch after Trac is back. Takeshi _

Re: darwinports.com

On Jan 8, 2008, at 12:48 AM, Michael Witten wrote: I still think my first suggestion is the best: (1) Clarify the situation in the FAQ, in the Wiki, and on the main page. Well, the project documentation is no different than, say, a Portfile - by all means open

Re: darwinports dot com

On Jan 8, 2008, at 2:25 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Well, we're aware that this problem exists. Partly as a result of this problem, since no agreement on the transfer of the domain name into our control could be reached, the name of the project was changed to MacPorts. The correct official web

MacPorts 1.6.1

So, how about a quick and simple 1.6.1 release? There are a couple of things I'd like to give a bit of a wider audience to: -) James' "load" and "unload" port actions; -) MacPorts build fixes with Universal flags turned on (usually through the MacPorts Portfile) and a Panther specific fix

Re: [32334] trunk/www/install.php

On Dec 28, 2007, at 7:07 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote: Revision 32334 Author [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date 2007-12-25 13:33:06 -0800 (Tue, 25 Dec 2007) Log Message Clarify that Leopard users need to install Xcode 3.0, while Tiger users need 2.5 (sorry Anders, no direct link to 2.4 off apple's sit

Re: [MacPorts] #13352: Shortened "Assign to" list in tickets

On Dec 21, 2007, at 6:12 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Bill, I made you a PHP script which parses out all the maintainer email addresses from the PortIndex. It runs in less than 2 seconds on my MacBook Pro. It's attached to this ticket: http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13673

Re: [32334] trunk/www/install.php

Juan Manuel Palacios wrote: As long as you are willing to deal with the breakage from using Xcode 2.5 (like #13736 et al), feel free to recommend either... I still think 2.4(.1) is the one to use while on Tiger. But the link is the same as ever: http://connect.apple.com My main concern was

Re: Different dmgs for different felines

Even though I do believe that Universal building is a bit of a waste of space more often than not for most, I do buy into the simplicity such builds report for users that only have to go looking for a single download link. Maybe Markus could advise us on how we could achieve this throug

Re: Different dmgs for different felines

On Jan 8, 2008, at 15:14, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote: Even though I do believe that Universal building is a bit of a waste of space more often than not for most, I do buy into the simplicity such builds report for users that only have to go looking for a single download link. Maybe Markus

Re: libiconv

I will upload the patch after Trac is back. I submitted the patch of g95 package. Could someone take a look? Takeshi ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.

Re: [32592] trunk/dports/python/py-django-devel/Portfile

On Jan 8, 2008, at 15:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Revision: 32592 http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/32592 Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2008-01-08 13:42:49 -0800 (Tue, 08 Jan 2008) Log Message: --- version bump to 0.96.1 Modified Paths: -

How embarrasing!

Warning: violation by /opt/local/man Warning: MacPorts violates the layout of the ports-filesystems! Warning: Please fix or indicate this misbehavior (if it is intended), it will be an error in future releases! Do you think it's safe to remove the ${prefix}/man symlink to $ {prefix}/share/

Re: [32596] trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile

On Jan 8, 2008, at 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified: trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile === --- trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile 2008-01-08 21:48:43 UTC (rev 32595) +++ trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile 2008-01-08

Re: Different dmgs for different felines

On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote: Maun Suang, since you reported to me that you already got the Panther dmg built, and that the errors you're experiencing (ui_prefix) manifest themselves regardless of whether you install from the dmg or from source, what would you

Re: [32596] trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:15:22PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Jan 8, 2008, at 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Modified: trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile > >=== > >--- trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile 2008-01-08 2

Re: [32596] trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile

On Jan 8, 2008, at 19:52, Eric Hall wrote: On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:15:22PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 8, 2008, at 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified: trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile === --- trunk/dports/prin

Re: [32194] trunk/base/src/port1.0/portconfigure.tcl

On Jan 8, 2008, at 00:54, Markus Weissmann wrote: This should definitely be made user-configurable. Most people will actually be interested in building 32 and 64 bit for their machine, that is either ppc+ppc64 or i386+x86_64. Yes, please! 64-bit Intel is the only thing I need 'universal'