Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-10 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Just one suggestion, as we all pile on Florian's design: Can we please try to do our best to resist the temptation of allowing the perfect to become the enemy of the good enough? I too see a lot of issues with Florian's portmill system, but I also know that things tend to evolve rather

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-10 Thread C. Florian Ebeling
Moving this to a *.macports.org domain would make sense to make clear that it is official. I am sure this is just where Florian is testing the whole thing. Yes, of course, and I think I mentioned it earlier somewhere. I'd really like to see move the app to a macports subdomain. Same with

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-10 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Most of that functionality can be embedded into javascript, which avoids putting all the work on the backend dev (C.Florian). Additionally, there are plenty of people who know Javascript/jQuery -- regardless of Ruby or PHP -- and can add it as a patch. Just a thought. On Jun 10, 2009, at

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-10 Thread C. Florian Ebeling
Looks great to me. Some feature requests, from an MacPorts user perspective. When I'm considering using MacPorts to help me out with a build, I need to know whether it's going to succeed. The first thing I want to do is search for a specific port to see whether it will build. So these might

Re: Removing configure options

2009-06-10 Thread Joshua Root
On 2009-6-10 10:18, Rainer Müller wrote: On 2009-06-09 23:24, Scott Haneda wrote: # $Id$ PortSystem 1.0 name rbldnsd version 0.996b categories sysutils master_siteshttp://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd/ distfiles

Re: Is it time to start regression testing yet?

2009-06-10 Thread C. Florian Ebeling
Florian did a really great job here. Thanks. :) I can understand reasons for developing that more or less in private as I assume he has been experimenting with that a lot before he came up with something usable. But I agree that it would be better now to have it in the MacPorts repository.

Re: [52043] trunk/dports/tex/texlive_base

2009-06-10 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
On Jun 10, 2009, at 07:56, Daniel J. Luke wrote: On Jun 9, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Something like configure.args-append --with-xdvi-x-toolkit=xaw variant motif { configure.args-delete --with-xdvi-x-toolkit=xaw configure.args-append --with-xdvi-x-toolkit=motif

Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
Hello, I have made a portfile, looking for a quick review, and any suggestions for cleanup. 1) How do I decide the category, can someone show me a list, and suggest the correct one for this? I see bind9 is in net, perhaps this should also be in net? 2) Do I really need the

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
distfiles is this by default: ${distname}${extract.suffix} distname is this by default: ${name}-${version} That is, distfiles (defined as the name of the distribution filename, not including the extract suffix) is ${name}-${version}${extract.suffix} If that hyphen really is an underscore,

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
On Jun 10, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: 1) How do I decide the category, can someone show me a list, and suggest the correct one for this? I see bind9 is in net, perhaps this should also be in net? Yes, this would make sense to be in net and then sysutils 2) Do I really need

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
Thanks, so I changed it to: distname${name}_${version} I believe that is correct. But now it ignores master_sites and I am timing out on looking for the file on macports servers. namerbldnsd version 0.996b categories sysutils maintainers

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:01 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: Scott Haneda wrote: Hello, I have made a portfile, looking for a quick review, and any suggestions for cleanup. pre-destroot { addgroup _rbldnsd set gid [existsgroup _rbldnsd] adduser _rbldnsd gid=${gid} realname=rbldnsd

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:07 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: On Jun 10, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: 1) How do I decide the category, can someone show me a list, and suggest the correct one for this? I see bind9 is in net, perhaps this should also be in net? Yes, this would make sense

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
If you run these commands, what is the URL it ends up using? sudo port clean --all rbldnsd sudo port -d fetch rbldnsd On Jun 10, 2009, at 9:08 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: Thanks, so I changed it to: distname${name}_${version} I believe that is correct. But now it ignores

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
In the destroot phase, all paths should be prefaced by ${destroot} On Jun 10, 2009, at 9:14 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: destroot { ## These perms are obviously wrong, fix them later # Install binary xinstall -m 0755 ${worksrcpath}/${name} ${destroot}${prefix}/sbin # Install man

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
3) How do the permissions I chose look in the destroot phase? Why is the program incapable of installing itself from --prefix=? I am not that versed in this stuff. I run ./configure and it works, if I run ./configure with the --prefix is balks at me... $./configure -help configure:

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: If you run these commands, what is the URL it ends up using? sudo port clean --all rbldnsd sudo port -d fetch rbldnsd Seems to be working now with distname${name}_${version} Seems to take a lot longer, since it now has to time

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: However, make sure those ${destroot} get added to the install paths that are missing them. I am not getting this, every effort I made, I get an error. destroot { # Install binary xinstall -m 0755 ${worksrcpath}/${name}

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:36 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: However, make sure those ${destroot} get added to the install paths that are missing them. I am not getting this, every effort I made, I get an error. destroot { # Install binary xinstall -m 0755 ${worksrcpath}/${name}

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
Yes. Call me officially frustrated... can someone see if this installs for them, or if they see anything obvious, as I am not: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/340087/Drops/06.10.09/net-d93a2d96-185819.zip $sudo port -d install DEBUG: Changing to port directory: /Users/haneda/macports/net/rbldnsd

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
Like this? worksrcdir ${name}_${version} I did, no change. If I do this: distfiles ${name}_${version}${extract.suffix} extract.suffix .tar.tgz Works fine, doing this, fails: distname${name}_${version} I think I should just go back to my original method,

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Bryan Blackburn
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 07:13:46PM -0700, Scott Haneda said: Like this? worksrcdir ${name}_${version} No, when you set distname, worksrcdir takes on the same value, which is this case appears to be wrong (the distname uses an underscore, but the extracted directory uses a dash). So if

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jun 10, 2009, at 7:22 PM, Bryan Blackburn wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 07:13:46PM -0700, Scott Haneda said: Like this? worksrcdir ${name}_${version} No, when you set distname, worksrcdir takes on the same value, which is this case appears to be wrong (the distname uses an

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Blair Zajac
Scott Haneda wrote: Hello, I have made a portfile, looking for a quick review, and any suggestions for cleanup. 1) How do I decide the category, can someone show me a list, and suggest the correct one for this? I see bind9 is in net, perhaps this should also be in net? 2) Do I really need

Re: Looking for a portfile review before submitting (rbldnsd)

2009-06-10 Thread Blair Zajac
Jeremy Lavergne wrote: On Jun 10, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: 1) How do I decide the category, can someone show me a list, and suggest the correct one for this? I see bind9 is in net, perhaps this should also be in net? Yes, this would make sense to be in net and then sysutils

downloads.sourceforge.net delivering HTML pages

2009-06-10 Thread Ryan Schmidt
downloads.sourceforge.net is returning an HTML page for anything I try to download from any port. Since downloads.sourceforge.net is the one with the lowest ping most of the time for me, this means a lot of sourceforge ports are failing for me. Is this happening to anybody else? This has

trd.no.distfiles.macports.org offline

2009-06-10 Thread Ryan Schmidt
trd.no.distfiles.macports.org does not respond to pings or web requests. Am I the only one seeing this? I've been experiencing this for days from multiple networks. ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org

Re: trd.no.distfiles.macports.org offline

2009-06-10 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Melchior:~ snc$ curl -I trd.no.distfiles.macports.org curl: (7) couldn't connect to host On Jun 11, 2009, at 12:43 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: trd.no.distfiles.macports.org does not respond to pings or web requests. Am I the only one seeing this? I've been experiencing this for days from