Ok, thanks for the explanation. And the fix to my logic in the Portfile.
David
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 11:53 AM, David Strubbe wrote:
>
> > Oh ok. I have seen some ports have a revision increased recently because
>
Hi,
This is probably not possible at the moment, but maybe there's some
feasible way to implement it?
On:
https://build.macports.org/builders/buildports-snowleopard-x86_64/builds/39756/steps/cleanup/logs/stdio
one can see the following:
./logs-20160113-111820/fail/p5-gimp.log
On Jan 13, 2016, at 11:53 AM, David Strubbe wrote:
> Oh ok. I have seen some ports have a revision increased recently because of a
> change of default variants, so I was following that, but I guess they
> shouldn't have been.
It varies. You just need to ask yourself: will this change result
Dear David,
Thank you for letting me know.
OK, let’s wait a few days to see if we need gsl116 or not.
Regards,
Takeshi
-
Takeshi Enomoto
take...@macports.org
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
On Jan 14, 2016, at 6:29 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> This is probably not possible at the moment, but maybe there's some
> feasible way to implement it?
>
> On:
>
> https://build.macports.org/builders/buildports-snowleopard-x86_64/builds/39756/steps/cleanup/logs/stdio
>
> one can see the
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016, at 02:43 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> > Revision: 144621
> > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/144621
> > Author: sean at macports.org
> > Date: 2016-01-13 23:29:24 -0800 (Wed, 13 Jan 2016)
> > Log Message:
> > ---
> > py-numpy: numpy needs fortran, so
On 2016-1-15 05:51 , Sean Farley wrote:
>
> Joshua Root writes:
>
>>> Revision: 144621
>>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/144621
>>> Author: sean at macports.org
>>> Date: 2016-01-13 23:29:24 -0800 (Wed, 13 Jan 2016)
>>> Log Message:
>>> ---
>>>
On 1/14/16 3:25 PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:28:48PM +0100, Christoph Iserlohn wrote:
>> But
>> $ port dependents go
>> returns
>> go has no dependents.
>> which is clearly wrong. I have several ports depending on go installed, e.g.:
>> $ port installed go-tools
>>
On 2016-1-15 10:36 , Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 6:31 PM, David Evans wrote:
>> On 1/14/16 3:25 PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:28:48PM +0100, Christoph Iserlohn wrote:
But
$ port dependents go
returns
go
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:28:48PM +0100, Christoph Iserlohn wrote:
> But
> $ port dependents go
> returns
> go has no dependents.
> which is clearly wrong. I have several ports depending on go installed, e.g.:
> $ port installed go-tools
> The following ports are currently installed:
>
On Jan 14, 2016, at 6:31 PM, David Evans wrote:
> On 1/14/16 3:25 PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:28:48PM +0100, Christoph Iserlohn wrote:
>>> But
>>> $ port dependents go
>>> returns
>>> go has no dependents.
>>> which is clearly wrong. I
Hi,
because of:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/golang-dev/MEATuOi_ei4/nl8jrt9YEwAJ
i would like to bump the revision of all dependents of go to force a rebuild
with version 1.5.3.
But
$ port dependents go
returns
go has no dependents.
which is clearly wrong. I have several ports depending
Joshua Root writes:
>> Revision: 144621
>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/144621
>> Author: sean at macports.org
>> Date: 2016-01-13 23:29:24 -0800 (Wed, 13 Jan 2016)
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>> py-numpy: numpy needs fortran, so require it
>
> We've
13 matches
Mail list logo