Hi,
I would like to move some files from foo_select to foo-common.
Ports foo-1 and foo-2 have a runtime dependency on both foo-common and
foo_select, but I'm not sure how to handle the transition in a proper
way to avoid foo-common overwriting or complaining about files that
have been put there
> On Mar 5, 2016, at 3:39 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 3, 2016, at 12:14 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
>>>
>>> Bradley,
>>>
>>> I think you and I
On 6 March 2016 at 19:15, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 18:44, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: macports-...@lists.macosforge.org
>> Subject: PortIndex2MySQL run failure on Sunday 2016-03-06 at 07:00:01
>> Date: March 6, 2016 at 9:00:18
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> On 6 March 2016 at 18:01, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>
>> We could remove all ports that depend on mysql4 and mysql5 exclusively or
>> via default variants. The remaining ports would then have their mysql4 or
>> mysql5
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: macports-...@lists.macosforge.org
> Subject: PortIndex2MySQL run failure on Sunday 2016-03-06 at 07:00:01
> Date: March 6, 2016 at 9:00:18 AM CST
> To: ad...@macosforge.org
>
>
> Synchronizing local ports tree from
>
On 6 March 2016 at 18:01, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> We could remove all ports that depend on mysql4 and mysql5 exclusively or
> via default variants. The remaining ports would then have their mysql4 or
> mysql5 variant removed.
>
> The removed ports could be brought back if someone was
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> On 6 March 2016 at 18:44, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: macports-...@lists.macosforge.org
>> Subject: PortIndex2MySQL run failure on Sunday 2016-03-06 at 07:00:01
>> Date: March 6, 2016
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> On 6 March 2016 at 18:01, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>
>> We could remove all ports that depend on mysql4 and mysql5 exclusively or
>> via default variants. The remaining ports would then have their mysql4 or
>> mysql5
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 07:15:29PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Whooops, I'm sorry, I didn't think about the possibility of this
> scenariot.
>
> Are you able to help me out to come up with a proper patch or should
> we simply replace
>
> if {[active_variants gtk3 quartz ""]} {
>