On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:07, jamesk...@macports.org wrote:
Revision 53034 Author jamesk...@macports.org Date 2009-06-28 08:07:34 -0700
(Sun, 28 Jun 2009)
Log Message
Version reduced to 2.8.9.1.
Ticket #19191
Again, the epoch will need to be bumped so port sees this as an update
Cheers
On Jun 28, 2009, at 13:11, David Bannister wrote:
So yes, there is no connectivity to Telia, Comcast and a handful of
German ISPs. This is due to some disagreements with AS1880 and
those ISPs. AS1880, the transit provider for this node does not
run a public network. It is a private
On Jun 28, 2009, at 09:38, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Should python31a1 not have been a devel package?
The way it seems to be right now is:
If there's only a single port (cairo, pango, graphviz) and you want
to have a port for the next not-yet-released version, then you use
the -devel
On Jun 28, 2009, at 17:01, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Should python31a1 not have been a devel package?
The way it seems to be right now is:
If there's only a single port (cairo, pango, graphviz) and you
want to have a port for the next not-yet-released version, then
you use the -devel suffix
On Jun 28, 2009, at 09:31, jamesk...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 53030
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/53030
Author: jamesk...@macports.org
Date: 2009-06-28 07:31:33 -0700 (Sun, 28 Jun 2009)
Log Message:
---
Converted to portgroup cmake 1.0 for proper handling of
Shouldn't -append be used here to avoid overwriting the portgroup
settings for each variable you use?
On Jun 28, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 28, 2009, at 09:31, jamesk...@macports.org wrote:
Ticket #20024
You can also remove these lines from the portfile now, since the
On Jun 27, 2009, at 6:50 AM, Jyrki Wahlstedt wrote:
Sorry
to come into this this late, but some background info for this might
be useful. There would be no trouble at all keeping wxWidgets at the
latest stable version, but and this is a big but, the upstream
maintainer of wxPython has
On Jun 28, 2009, at 19:00, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Shouldn't -append be used here to avoid overwriting the portgroup
settings for each variable you use?
Yes! Good eye, thanks for catching that.
On Jun 28, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 28, 2009, at 09:31,
