Any objections to removal of the carbon variant in py-wxpython-2.8?

2014-01-15 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hi, The port py-wxpython-2.8 currently supports two conflicting variants: +carbon (32-bit Carbon-based wxWidgets) +gtk (GTK-based wxWidgets) On 10.6 the variant +carbon is the default one, while on 10.7 and later only +gtk can be used anyway. I would like to remove the variant +carbon

Re: Any objections to removal of the carbon variant in py-wxpython-2.8?

2014-01-15 Thread Eric Gallager
I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for py-wxpython-2.8... On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Mojca Miklavec mo...@macports.org wrote: Hi, The port py-wxpython-2.8 currently supports two conflicting variants: +carbon (32-bit Carbon-based wxWidgets) +gtk (GTK-based

Re: Any objections to removal of the carbon variant in py-wxpython-2.8?

2014-01-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27, Eric Gallager wrote: I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for py-wxpython-2.8… Yes but would it be a problem for you to use the +gtk variant instead? If so please explain. ___ macports-dev mailing list

Fwd: Any objections to removal of the carbon variant in py-wxpython-2.8?

2014-01-15 Thread Eric Gallager
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote: On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27, Eric Gallager wrote: I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for py-wxpython-2.8… Yes but would it be a problem for you to use the +gtk variant instead? If so please