On 10/16/14, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On Oct 16, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
So Yosemite is out today. Might as well tag a new release before I build
the pkg. Is there anything critical that needs to go onto the branch
first?
Could we update the checks in
On 10/17/14, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On Oct 17, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
On 10/16/14, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
For example, we should inform users of 10.9.4 and earlier that they
should update.
Update from 10.9.4 to 10.9.5, or to 10.10?
To 10.9.5.
OK, phew
Maybe not new py24-foo or new py25-foo ports, but what about +python24
or +python25 variants for ordinary ports that have python bindings?
For example, this isn't the port itself, but from reading the upstream
gdb mailing lists, it looks like gdb upstream actually extended their
support for python
On 9/20/14, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On Sep 20, 2014, at 6:18 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
On Sep 20, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Mark Brethen wrote:
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Clemens Lang wrote:
You're thinking it should run automatically instead of user setting?
Setting
On 9/25/14, Lawrence Velázquez lar...@macports.org wrote:
On Sep 25, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Eric Gallager eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu wrote:
Pretty sure `ui_debug` only prints when the user uses the `-d` flag
(for debug), as opposed to, say, `ui_info`, which always prints.
I know `system` swallows
Does it have to parallel selfupdate? diagnose works perfectly well
by itself without the self in front of it...
On 8/26/14, Craig Treleaven ctrelea...@macports.org wrote:
On Aug 25, 2014, at 6:35 AM, Rainer Müller rai...@macports.org wrote:
However, I am not too happy with naming the command
no gcc installed
anymore. But clang is the new gcc.
To clarify:
--- on the command line ---
$ gcc
clang: error: no input files
--- end of command line ---
(my system: OSX 10.8.5)
Regards,
Michael
Am 04.06.2014 um 18:38 schrieb Eric Gallager eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu:
Maybe I'll install clang
Do you also have the years when Apple made each of these versions its
system perl as well?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Mark Anderson e...@emer.net wrote:
Yeah, I'm with Daniel here. I think we should only support the latest
version of Perl.
From perl.org: *We recommend that you always
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:18 PM, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 04, 2014, at 20:21, Eric Gallager wrote:
Wow, that looks a lot simpler than I thought that it would be... I was
expecting something like this would have to be fixed upstream by gcc,
because that is how
A compromise here could be, instead of getting rid of openmaintainer
entirely, or keeping it opt-in like it currently is, we could make it
opt-out instead. There are two ways we could do this:
1. When committing new ports submitted by users without commit access, make
it a policy to automatically
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
On 2014-7-22 10:08 , Adam Dershowitz wrote:
A few ideas:
Checking for files that should not be in macports directory, that end up
being there. They could be left either by an old install, or by a
different installer
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Daniel J. Luke dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
On Jul 22, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Mojca Miklavec mo...@macports.org wrote:
- I'm unable to test 1000 ports.
we should probably enhance `port test` to be more useful. With the perl
modules (at least), they usually have
Forwarding this to macports-dev, as I said I would in the ticket (in
response to a user request asking that this be brought to the attention of
a mailing list):
-- Forwarded message --
From: MacPorts noreply@...
Date: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [MacPorts] #43502:
Looks like jmr took care of updating the port for me, thanks jmr!
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org
wrote:
On Jul 11, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Eric Gallager eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu wrote:
Right, this just reminded me, I need to update the port-depgraph port
Right, this just reminded me, I need to update the port-depgraph port to
work with MacPorts 2.3+... is there already a newer subversion revision
that I could point it at, or would I have to update the actual
port-depgraph script myself, too?
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Ryan Schmidt
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Aljaž Srebrnič g...@macports.org wrote:
Should we start thinking about a golang PortGroup?
Yeah, the amount of golang-using software has been slowly increasing
lately, but not much of it has made it to MacPorts yet. Having a golang
PortGroup would definitely
The way I would handle each of those categories would be:
- mandatory: simple enough, just use a `port:`-style depspec
- recommended: use a `bin:`-style depspec, so the system versions
can still satisfy it. Note that the autogen port does not fit in with
the rest of the autotools suite, despite
On 6/29/14, Mihai Moldovan io...@ionic.de wrote:
* On 30.06.2014 04:06 am, Eric Gallager wrote:
Note that the autogen port does not fit in with
the rest of the autotools suite, despite its name
gnutls has been searching for ${prefix}/bin/autogen. Not sure what it meant
to find, exactly. I
On 6/6/14, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Vincent vi...@macports.org wrote:
With the quotes. Pedantically ${1+$@} is most correct, but (a) I
suspect the case that protects against would fail anyway, and (b) on OS X
/bin/sh is bash which handles $@
Of those ports you mention, I currently only have kchmviewer installed
on my current machine, which I installed while testing different
chm-viewing applications. I generally use the Chmox port for those
purposes now though. I would still urge caution when
removing/obsoleting the rest though, just
On 6/5/14, Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
Of those ports you mention, I currently only have kchmviewer installed
on my current machine, which I installed while testing different
chm-viewing applications. I generally use
/ticket/43894
On 04 giugno 2014 at 20:34:33, Eric Gallager (eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu) wrote:
Also, while we are commenting on this revision, is the entirety of
texlive
really needed for the docs variant? If the description says that it
requires LaTeX, that seems to me like it would just indicate
As far as access to old hardware goes, I have an old PowerPC iMac G3
running 10.3.9 sitting in my basement gathering dust (which is too old
to even build base, so I am not sure why I even mentioned it...), and
an old white plastic MacBook running 10.5/i386, which I do not think I
have installed
On 6/5/14, Clemens Lang c...@macports.org wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback everyone. More details inline below:
Like we do with the Portfiles in trunk, could you split the patch between
the whitespace changes and the functionality changes?
I could, but it would mean extra work for me
Wow, that looks a lot simpler than I thought that it would be... I was
expecting something like this would have to be fixed upstream by gcc,
because that is how they handle the GNU vs. NeXT Objective C runtime
issues, but if all it takes in this case is this script, it seems like just
using this
Like we do with the Portfiles in trunk, could you split the patch between
the whitespace changes and the functionality changes? Right now with the
two of them together, it is kind of harder to know which sections of the
patch to focus on when reading it...
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:41 PM,
Also, while we are commenting on this revision, is the entirety of texlive
really needed for the docs variant? If the description says that it
requires LaTeX, that seems to me like it would just indicate a dependency
on texlive-latex or maybe texlive-latex-extra, but not necessarily the
whole
According to Fink's documentation, adding a .build extension to the
folder name has the same effect as adding a .noindex extension to it,
which is what they do with their build folder:
http://www.finkproject.org/doc/users-guide/uguide.en.html#conf.optional
So that could be another option...
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht pixi...@macports.org
wrote:
There is the macportsscripts port, I don't know much about it
The macportsscripts port used to be phw's, and installed a single script,
port-fetchall.sh, that dealt with the issue described in
Just realized that I forgot to make sure that this made it back to the
lists, so re-cc-ing macports-dev...
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:23 AM, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
Hi Eric,
On 12 May 2014, at 01:40 , Eric Gallager eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu wrote:
Yes, it would be... I came across a script
So it is. Thanks for getting it up again!
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Shreeraj Karulkar skarul...@apple.comwrote:
All
Trac is up again.
Shree
On May 20, 2014, at 3:24 AM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On May 20, 2014, at 05:19, Peter Danecek peter.dane...@bo.ingv.it
I was under the impression that the recommendation to install X11 was just
a recommendation, and not actually a requirement... The section does not
actually say that installing X11 is a requirement to use MacPorts, it just
says that it is highly recommended for many MacPorts apps. Although I
...@macports.orgwrote:
On May 19, 2014, at 17:00, Eric Gallager wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 11, 2014, at 20:47, MacPorts wrote:
Page InstallingMacPorts was changed by eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu
Diff URL:
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/InstallingMacPorts?action
I would have applied if I were still a student this year, but I graduated
last May, so I would have felt a little dishonest applying for something
that is supposed to be for students when I am no longer one...
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Clemens Lang c...@macports.org wrote:
Hi Mojca
There is a `notes` keyword that can be used in Portfiles to display stuff
under `port notes` and at the end of the process of installing a port
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Vincent Habchi vi...@macports.org wrote:
Hi there,
would it be possible to add to the Orfeotoolbox Portfile a few
Instead of modifying the Makefile, how about trying to modify the Doxyfile
instead? That was what eventually worked for me when I was running into
some issues with doxygen when adding a `+docs` variant to the port for
dpkg...
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Peter Danecek
, Eric Gallager eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu wrote:
Instead of modifying the Makefile, how about trying to modify the
Doxyfile instead? That was what eventually worked for me when I was running
into some issues with doxygen when adding a `+docs` variant to the port for
dpkg...
For sure in practice
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:55 PM, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
Hi devs,
I just wonder whether someone out there
has already written some script
which can determine for any given port A
whether non-binary ports B1-Bn are to be build
during port
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:52 PM, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
On 21 Mar 2014, at 00:14 , Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
I'm not aware of any ports that do that, or any tests that are designed
to work that way.
Only recently I came across the test phase which can be defined in a
Sounds kind of like the sensible alternatives approach that many
dpkg-based package managers take:
https://packages.debian.org/unstable/sensible-utils
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Mojca Miklavec mo...@macports.org wrote:
Hi,
for Python ports it makes sense not to install python to
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Mojca Miklavec mo...@macports.orgwrote:
It probably wouldn't be such a bad idea to create a script
$prefix/bin/portname-initversion.sh which would prepend
I was under the impression that the depends: pseudo-portname and the
depof: portname were two separate things...
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:19 PM, David Strubbe dstru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hm, I guess I got depends: from suggestions in messages on this list.
Using port installed depof:gcr gcr is
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Daniel J. Luke dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
On Apr 4, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Mojca Miklavec mo...@macports.org wrote:
Having the meeting at two locations (one in Europe and one somewhere
in USA) at the same time and organizing a short videoconference each
day. But
I thought we were doing variants now, when the dependency is for more
than just the perl executable, at least:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43193
On 4/4/14, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On Apr 4, 2014, at 00:03, dev...@macports.org wrote:
Revision
118533
Author
I would be interested in going, although Europe is kind of far away
from North America... What continent are most people from macports-dev
located on?
(Also, apparently 100 EUR is about $140 USD, and 30 EUR/day is about
$40 USD/day... I had no idea that the two currencies had diverged that
much
Oops, I did not see this message before sending my previous one, which
said pretty
much the same thing... US/ET here as well, and both Washington/DC/US and
Boston/MA/US would be easier for me, as I already have experience with
both cities...
although it would be cool to go to Europe sometime if I
How about making a separate perl5-rewrite branch in subversion, working
on the draft in that branch, and then merging that once it is ready? That
would still technically meet jmr's ideally in a single commit criterion,
as the only commit to trunk would be the merge from the other branch.
On
On 4/3/14, Clemens Lang c...@macports.org wrote:
However, I've noticed during my last use of port_cutleaves from contrib [1]
that
I see failures to open Portfiles from registry a lot more often than I used
to.
I tried investigating a little, but haven't been able to pinpoint a reason for
You might want to cc sean on this, as he was the one who wrote the
compilers-1.0.tcl PortGroup...
On 3/27/14, Sébastien Maret sebastien.ma...@icloud.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm writing a portfile for a software written in C/C++ and Fortran77/90:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/42886
Following a
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
On Mar 20, 2014, at 02:46, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Despite the fact that I kept pushing a couple of other projects to
switch to a different version control system (mostly from CVS to git),
MacPorts is one of those
Besides all the things mentioned in this thread so far, I would like
to note that there are some options to have it both ways and have a
bigger presence on GitHub, even if we still keep our Trac
infrastructure as well. For one, there is the mirrors account that
has a bunch of read-only mirrors set
Also trac appears to be failing to display recent commits again...
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Peter Danecek peter.dane...@bo.ingv.itwrote:
This one still persists ...
~petr
On 12 Mar 2014, at 16:57, Peter Danecek peter.dane...@bo.ingv.it wrote:
Hi all,
I just realised that
Bringing this discussion to macports-dev as suggested. Anyways,
r117621https://trac.macports.org/changeset/117621 removed
a bunch of flags from the configure script in base, many of which I found
useful. Personally, I generally prefer giving users more configure options
rather than fewer, as I
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
On 2014-3-8 07:13 , Eric Gallager wrote:
Bringing this discussion to macports-dev as suggested. Anyways, r117621
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/117621 removed a bunch of flags
from the configure script in base, many
Could the buildbot running out of disk space account for the corrupted
clang-3.3 binary archive that I reported in
#42668https://trac.macports.org/ticket/42668?
Maybe it ran out of disk space when creating the archive, and the resulting
error led to the archive being truncated due to never having
That can get bypassed for GSOC students though, right? At least that
was how I remember mariusc got his commit rights, and he was the most
recent committer added that I can think of... Anyways, with all these
GSOC students that look like they are applying this year, perhaps when
they get their
I agree that normatively, now would be better than later, I was just
speculating descriptively about what it might take to get some new
approvals...
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Clemens Lang c...@macports.org wrote:
Hi,
That can get bypassed for GSOC students though, right? At least
+2 for Clemens being part of portmgr. Objectively, he would be a good
choice due to his activity level and amount of contributions to the
project. Biasedly, I would want him to be part of it because he was
the one who encouraged me to apply for commit rights in the first
place...
On 2/28/14,
Trac looks down to me from here, too:
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/trac.macports.org agrees as well...
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Peter Danecek peter.dane...@bo.ingv.itwrote:
Update:
I just got the confirmation mail back for the ticket I was submitting. So
something still works,
Do you have a link to your fork on Github? I would like to star it.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Mark Anderson e...@emer.net wrote:
So I've started messing around with getting a Proof of Concept CPAN-MP
link working, so we don't need to have to have 8 billion perl ports. This
was an idea
Is there an easy way to convert a non-trunk installation of MacPorts into a
trunk installation of it? The relevant guide
sectionhttp://guide.macports.org/#installing.macports.subversion
says:
If you installed MacPorts using the package installer, skip this section.
I don't exactly have room for
Really? That sounds dangerous, but if you say it works fine, I guess I can
give it a try...
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Clemens Lang c...@macports.org wrote:
Just install right over it, that works fine.
--
Clemens Lang
___
macports-dev
I am working on a Portfile from which I want to call the `unifdef` command.
The manpage for `unifdef` says: Exit status is 0 if output is exact copy
of input, 1 if not, 2 if trouble. The whole reason I am running `unifdef`
is to change the output, so I *want* it to return 1. However, when I put
I had to escape the brackets, but after that, it worked. Thanks!
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
On 2014-2-9 12:22 , Eric Gallager wrote:
I am working on a Portfile from which I want to call the `unifdef`
command. The manpage for `unifdef` says: Exit
You might want to add yourself on CC on
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/39910 as I added some patches that allow
all 3 versions of bison to be installed in parallel to that ticket
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Akim Demaille akim.demai...@gmail.comwrote:
Le 26 janv. 2014 à 16:24, Akim
Just so it can remove it with the `+debug` variant that it adds, it looks
like...
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
On 2014-1-24 09:50 , Sean Farley wrote:
lar...@macports.org writes:
(a) There's already a configure.mtune option. You should use
The one thing I'd caution against is removing any py24* ports that have no
newer versions. I cannot think of any off the top of my head, but I guess
that would just be something to check for while removing the py24* ports,
i.e., making sure that they have a version available for a newer python
Go for it! I want to see how it turns out.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Sean Farley s...@macports.org wrote:
s...@macports.org writes:
s...@macports.org writes:
s...@macports.org writes:
Hello all and Happy Boxing Day!
I have done a complete rewrite of the compilers and
It just feels more Mac-native. Also it has a shorter dependency chain in
that it does not drag in gtk, nor does it require that gtk be installed
with the `+x11` variant.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
On Jan 15, 2014, at 19:57, Eric Gallager wrote
I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for
py-wxpython-2.8...
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Mojca Miklavec mo...@macports.org wrote:
Hi,
The port py-wxpython-2.8 currently supports two conflicting variants:
+carbon (32-bit Carbon-based wxWidgets)
+gtk (GTK-based
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org
wrote:
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27, Eric Gallager wrote:
I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for
py-wxpython-2.8…
Yes but would it be a problem for you to use the +gtk variant instead? If
so please
Is the giant patch still necessary after the update to gettext in
r115755https://trac.macports.org/changeset/115755
?
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
jerem...@macports.org wrote:
On Dec 31, 2013, at 14:01, David Evans dev...@macports.org wrote:
On 12/31/13 1:22
oops sorry I missed that one... thanks for pointing it out to me.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
On Jan 10, 2014, at 16:22, Eric Gallager wrote:
Is the giant patch still necessary after the update to gettext in
r115755?
The giant patch
I had been working on getting their ports updated at one point, but it's a
lot of work and I don't think I ever finished the job...
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Johannes Kastl m...@ojkastl.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
I just stumbled upon the
I'd be willing to help, but unfortunately I think that the a few spare
cycles requirement is going to disqualify me, as my main hard drive
recently died and I'm still in the process of transferring to a new one...
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:47 PM, David Evans dev...@macports.org wrote:
The
Is there a trac plugin or setting that we could use to have our trac
automatically close tickets like that, too?
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Eric A. Borisch ebori...@macports.orgwrote:
I failed to manually close the ticket. (I'm used to a Trac that scans
commit messages for closes #x)
I think I tried installing it once but was never able to do so successfully:
Local-Admins-MacBook-Pro:~ root# port installed wxmsw
None of the specified ports are installed.
I forget what the exact build failure was... Anyway I would like to keep it
around and get it to work because there was some
Emailing the mailing lists like this sometimes works. I just added myself
on cc.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Akim Demaille akim.demai...@gmail.comwrote:
For instance https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34225
Cheers!
___
macports-dev mailing
What about using the libcxx and libcxxabi ports for libc++? Is there any
way to make that work?
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Clemens Lang c...@macports.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:00:25PM +, Christopher Jones wrote:
Is this really a good idea though. My recollection is,
This is http://trac.macports.org/ticket/5001
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:49 PM, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
Hi MacPorts core devs,
just now I once again missed a feature I wish was there in MP.
If I install a lot of ports (when I am setting up a machine from scratch,
like now) or upgrade
Hoping this gets fixed sometime soon, because for some reason it's been
screwing with my `camlimages` build...
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Titus von Boxberg ti...@v9g.de wrote:
Am 11.11.2013 20:08, schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
Yeah, I agree, it's nice to have the GNOME 3 versions of GNOME software
available via MacPorts... I just wish we could have kept the GNOME 2
versions of some of them around at the same time...
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
Dave, thanks for all
I wasn't even trying to log in, I was just refreshing the page, and got a
similar error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/trac/web/api.py, line 441,
in send_error
data, 'text/html')
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/trac/web/chrome.py, line
828,
Speaking of my script, I've made a bunch of changes to it recently, so I'll
probably need to create a new tag sometime so I can update the
`macportsscripts` port that points to it... The version from 0.1.4 still
reports library links that are there due to libtool overlinking, and I've
been working
Apply for commit access: http://guide.macports.org/#project.membership
Warning: it can take a while to get approved though...
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Robert Oschwald
robertoschw...@googlemail.com wrote:
I’m co-maintainer of sysutils/bacula and want to take over maintenance of
Really? That's strange, I could've sworn I was able to use the qmake
portgroup in my local PortFile repository successfully when I was testing
it...
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
On Nov 1, 2013, at 13:29, David Strubbe wrote:
Is it possible to
Yes there is, it just gets put in `/opt/local/libexec/gnubin`, which is not
added to PATH by default. This is the same as most other GNU ports.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
On Nov 1, 2013, at 15:41, michae...@macports.org wrote:
+# In
Me three. I had to check the macports-changes mailing list to be able to
see the most recent changes:
https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-changes/2013-October/date.html
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Aljaž 'g5pw' Srebrnič g...@macports.orgwrote:
Yup, i noticed that, too.
On 30
Yeah it can take a while to hear anything back... I sent in an application
back in May and I haven't really heard anything back, either...
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:52 PM, David Strubbe dstru...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
Yes, I sent an email to macports-...@lists.macosforge.org about a month
In the blog post you link to, it mentions a tool called
cpp11-migratehttp://clang.llvm.org/extra/cpp11-migrate.html,
which has since been renamed to
clang-modernizehttp://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-modernize.html.
Could we have this be a sub-port of at least one of the Macports clang
ports, so as
Couldn't a bin-style dependency be used here (i.e. bin:iconv:libiconv) so
that /usr/bin/iconv can fulfill it as well?
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
On Oct 16, 2013, at 04:33, j...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 112272
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/trac.macports.org/timeline says that
it's not just me... Anyone got any idea why? I had a ticket I wanted to
file... I guess it can wait though...
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
wrote:
Times out for me too.
I've forwarded it to the generic admin account and Mr. Siegrist's.
On Oct 14, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/trac.macports.org/timeline says
that it's not just me... Anyone got any idea why? I had a ticket I
They've worked perfectly fine as non-conflicting up until this point...
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
On Oct 12, 2013, at 14:09, strom...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 112137
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/112137
Author:
or just do that thing that some python ports do where older python versions
have separately-written sub-ports for the last version of that subport that
worked with that python version.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Clemens Lang c...@macports.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at
You can use the `-d` flag to your port command to make sure. Although since
it didn't error out on you, I would assume that it worked...
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:21 PM, MacPorts nore...@macports.org wrote:
#40508: unicode_path patch not working on subversion 1.8.3 release
I think it was Sean Farley, so I'm explicitly adding him on cc to this
conversation...
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
jerem...@macports.org wrote:
Yeah, that sounds reasonable.
As for the PortGroup, IIRC, someone was working on a general compilers
PortGroup
Yeah, that's Mountain Lion
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Jeremy Lavergne
jer...@lavergne.gotdns.orgwrote:
After some version, the OS is now OS X and no longer Mac OS X
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
If it's so easy to work around it, then that means it should be pretty easy
to add an alias or something that does the same thing as the workaround in
base, right?
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
On Oct 2, 2013, at 13:53, Peter Danecek wrote:
(1)
I have actually wanted something like this in base for a while now, and
just forgot to open a ticket about it...
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
On Oct 2, 2013, at 16:49, Eric Gallager wrote:
If it's so easy to work around it, then that means
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
