I have the same problem on that.
It's very inconvenient.
On Nov 27, 2007 4:40 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'ld like to add the maintainer to the Cc field of a ticket (#13399)
> I've filed. How do I do that after having submitted the ticket ?
>
> --
> Bjarne D Mathiesen
> Kø
Hi,
I filed a tichet and attached patches but no response is returned.
http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/13431
Someone please check my patches into the svn?
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.mac
Hi,
I submitted two new ports, py25-httplib2 and py25-lxml about a week ago,
but I've got no response...
Could anyone please review these attachment and commit them to svn?
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13411
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13393
___
Both works on my machine.
On Dec 3, 2007 12:53 AM, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I submitted two new ports, py25-httplib2 and py25-lxml about a week ago,
> but I've got no response...
>
> Could anyone please review these attachment and commit them to svn?
&
Hi,
I filed a tichet and attached patches but no response is returned.
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13459
Someone please check my patches into the svn?
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.m
Hi list,
I've just installed coreutils and found that
all files in coreutils have "g" prefix.
"port cat corefiles" show that this is because
coreutils' portfile set configure.args to "program-prefix=g".
The reason why I installed coreutils was to
run shell script that uses seq but for the "g" pre
Hi Rainer.
Thanks for your quick reply.
On Dec 22, 2007 9:41 PM, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> js wrote:
> [...]
> > Yes, I can easily avoid this by "port edit corefiles" and drop
> > "program-prefix"
> > but I thought if most of the
On Dec 22, 2007 10:13 PM, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> js wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 2007 9:41 PM, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> js wrote:
> >>> So let me ask this, "Do you like to have gls, guniq in your
> >>&g
But it have no doubt having "g" prefix is safer than installing bins without it.
On Dec 22, 2007 10:30 PM, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2007 10:13 PM, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > js wrote:
> > > On Dec 22, 2007 9:41
But there's no working 1.6 binary for OS X 10.3.
Wouldn't it be nice to postpone that change after the fix?
(I won't be long, right?)
On Dec 23, 2007 11:41 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When filing a new ticket, the default MacPorts version is still
> 1.5.2. Since 1.6.0 has been re
lect what most
> users want.
>
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 21:25, js wrote:
>
> > But there's no working 1.6 binary for OS X 10.3.
> > Wouldn't it be nice to postpone that change after the fix?
> > (I won't be long, right?)
> >
>
> > On Dec 23, 200
Forwarding to macports developers.
-- Forwarded message --
From: js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 25, 2007 12:19 AM
Subject: macforge.org via https?
To: MacPorts Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi list,
A simple question.
is there any reason http://www.macosforge.org/
> Why is it again that we need separate dmgs for separate OS releases
> at all? Why don't we just have a single universal dmg, with the
> PowerPC part built with the 10.3.9 SDK and the Intel part built with
> the 10.4u SDK, and everyone's happy? Isn't that the whole point of
> universal binaries an
What's happen after -devel port get officially released?
are they removed from svn?
On Feb 3, 2008 9:15 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The guide needs to say something (quite a lot, actually) about *-
> devel ports. The only thing it currently says is:
>
> "Non-port dependencies sho
I think -devel is better.
For one thing, it's more intuitive.
Second, this naming convension is already used in FreeBSD
so at least BSD users prefers -devel one.
By the way, I think MacPorts is not for everyone,
I mean, it's mostly for developer or kinds of techies, right?
So IMHO providing an ea
On Feb 7, 2008 1:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I think -devel is better.
> >> For one thing, it's more intuitive.
>
> It was proposed that -devel ports should be updated to the latest
> stable version, if the latest stable version is newer than the latest
> development version
> > Some of our non-devel ports do install development versions because
> > the latest releases don't work at all or are years out of date, say.
> > But generally this should not be the case. If you think the latest
> > stable release of a program is not suitable, then you should push
> > the devel
03 PM, Emmanuel Hainry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Citando js :
>
> > On Feb 7, 2008 1:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> I think -devel is better.
> > > >> For one thing, it's more intuitive.
> > >
> > >
If the developer call it as stable and the other's development,
Let' follow it.
Anyone who like to use newer can easily choose -devel one.
On Feb 7, 2008 10:50 PM, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-02-07 22:08:57 +0900, js wrote:
> > I agree with you,
> Then let me acquaint you with our ports tree:
>
> boehmgc (7.0) is newer than boehmgc-devel (6.3alpha6)
> php5 (5.2.5) is newer than php5-devel (5.2.5RC2)
> swi-prolog (5.6.50) is newer than swi-prolog-devel (5.5.36)
> sylpheed (2.2.3) is newer than sylpheed-devel (2.2.0beta7)
> tin (1.8.3) is ne
So, have we reached the conclusion on this?
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Forgot to send this to macports-dev...
forwarding.
-- Forwarded message --
From: js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 13, 2008 9:52 PM
Subject: Trac ticket that need your attension: py25-mysql
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maintainers,
This is the reminder for the
Maintainer,
This is the reminder for the ticket which hasn't received no response
from maintainers more than 72 hours.
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14255
Please take a look and commit the patch if everything's file
___
macports-de
And pylons 0.9.6.1 and the too.
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14235
On 2/13/08, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maintainer,
>
> This is the reminder for the ticket which hasn't received no response
> from maintainers more than 72 hours.
>
Might be better to send this to macports-dev.
On 2/13/08, Florian Ebeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I submitted a Portfile for a new port a couple of weeks ago, but
> nothing happend.
>
> http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/13779
>
> Is there anything wrong with it? I thi
The maintainer didn't answer the ticket within 72 hours.
(According to MacPorts Guide, a maintainer's supposed to apply patches
within 72 hours)
Here's the ticket: http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14265
Please take a look at this and commit the patch.
Thanks.
__
Sorry to disturb, but another reminder.
> Maintainers,
>
> This is the reminder for the ticket which hasn't received no response
> from maintainers more than 72 hours.
> http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13410
>
> Please take a look and commit the patch if everything's fine
Hi,
MacPorts Guide says
"The maintainer should apply the patches and close the ticket within 72 hours."
"If the maintainer does not respond within 72 hours, you or another
committer may review the patches and update the port."
But actually this is not always the case.
So I started to consider 72
Hi,
As you know, MD5 has serious flaws (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5)
So recently I don't use it and even remove it when I found it in the
checksum part of portfile.
I thought dropping use of md5 in portfile would be nice.
Any thought?
___
macports
> Disagree. Three types of checksums (md5, sha1, rmd160) in a portfile
> are stronger than just two.
> I would agree that ports should not use md5 alone, but I would also
> say that ports should not use sha1 or rmd160 alone. Ports should use
> all three checksum types.
When we have sha1 and rmd160
> You might say we should therefore use sha1 or rmd160 instead. But
> what if a similar problem is discovered in sha1 or rmd160?
MD5 already has one, others are not.
> Even if flaws exist in all three checksum algorithms that enable
> differing files to have the same checksum, it is virtually imp
NP, author has free to ignore the warning message ;)
On Feb 16, 2008 2:36 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2008, at 23:29, js wrote:
>
> >> You might say we should therefore use sha1 or rmd160 instead. But
> >> what if a similar pro
Hi Blair,
If Maintainers think so, that's fine with me.
I just guessed 72 hours are not practical to accept for maintainers.
On 2/16/08, Blair Zajac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> js wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > MacPorts Guide says
> >
> > "The maintai
# Moving from Trac ticket #14342
> No, py25-foo can have different dependencies than py-foo. I don't know
> what you wanted to tell us with this.
I meant if we would change python24 to drop some standard modules like
the current python25 port does, py-foo and py25-foo's dependencies
would be the
Just out of curiosity, could you tell me why default python25 drops
those modoles?
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
I'm not sure whether Trac has this capability or not,
but I think having reminder would prevent maintainers from
missing their jobs.
The reminder would be sent to maintainers when
- the status of the ticket remains new more than 3 days
- the ticket has a patch to review but not answered more tha
sides, I don't have permission to change Assigned to field of a Trac ticket.
Maintainers probably don't see ticket not assigned to them.
If I could assign maintainers to my tickets, I might help the situation.
On 2/18/08, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fe
There seems to be few people who is interested in this issue :(
I really love to fix this for consistency.
If somebody asked, I'd do create py25-ports which already exist for python24.
python25 should be more used than python24.
The more modules python25 has, the more people likely to use python25
> > Besides, I don't have permission to change Assigned to field of a
> > Trac ticket.
> > Maintainers probably don't see ticket not assigned to them.
>
> Correct. Adding the maintainer to the Cc line would also work in a
> pinch.
Just a email is easy to miss, I guess.
> > If I could assign maint
ld be able to find a ticket or two to comment
> on if you want to continue the debate.
>
> -Bill
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2008, at 4:56 AM, js wrote:
> >>> Besides, I don't have permission to change Assigned to field of a
> >>> Trac ticket.
>
Hi Markus,
> does not compute: "python25 drops but python25 doesn't" --
> contradiction detected. ;)
Oops! That's typo.
My question was why python2.4 and 2.5 is different.
> If the question was why python25 does not build all auxiliary modules
> [1] like _sqlite3 etc.: For people who don't ne
> > Thanks for thorough explanation. That makes sense.
> > The reason why I started this discussion is that
> > I want to make python24 to be python25-like port.
> > What if I created patches for this,
> > Would you accept that changes?
> >
>
> well, what else do you want to change? There al
I suggest giving non-maintainers the permission to change "Assigned to" field.
Once tickets are properly assigned, all you have to do is to look at
"My tickets".
In addition to that, How abount sending reminder to macports-dev
when there're tickets unchanged more than a few weeks?
Trac's backend i
> > I suggest giving non-maintainers the permission to change "Assigned
> > to" field.
>
> It seems to me like that would be a good idea too. But I'm not sure
> what all the implications of that would be.
According to Trac doc[1], if I had TICKET_CHGPROP,
I could modify ticket properties except
Hi,
when I viist http://www.macports.org/ with Safari v.1.3.2,
I always see the warnings saying
This page contains the following errors:
error on line 41 at column 459: Entity 'nbsp' not defined
error on line 92 at column 45: Entity 'ldquo' not defined
error on line 113 at column 211: Entity 'ld
n
> our issue tracker so we can correct this.
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2008, at 23:07, js wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > when I viist http://www.macports.org/ with Safari v.1.3.2,
> > I always see the warnings saying
> >
> >
> > This page
You can rely on RSS for that matter.
One thing I want to have is weekly summary report of macports-dev,
macports-list.
Although this would need editors to write it up, very attractive for me.
On 2/22/08, Randall Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Openoffice.org publishes a daily email of new ticket
more about the subject than me ;-) In any case, would using the
> unicode code points fix the problems?
>
> Regards,...
>
>
> -jmpp
>
>
>
> >
> > On Feb 22, 2008, at 23:07, js wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> when
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200410/safari_and_xhtml/
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> js wrote:
> > The problem is Safari 1.3 is processing the page as an XML document,
> > even though, just as you pointed out, it'
Nice.
HOWTOs I'd like to see there are
- How to upgrate outdated ports most effectively (port upgrade -fun ?)
- How to uninstall MacPorts completely
- How to start writing Portfile
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started a new HOWTO sectio
I don't think this is not worth the effort.
if there were a way to provide instrictions, it would encourages
developer to write more messages I suppose.
On 2/29/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > The problem is that if you do miss these messages, then you can't
> >> > easil
The folllowing tickets has been unchanged more than 3 days.
Please review/commit them.
ipython
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14360
twisted
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14375
python_select
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14452
sqlal
> For this rather long nedi help, I would prefer to put them into some
> file like /opt/local/share/doc/nedi/INSTALL.macports and just print a
> message that there is additional help in this file.
I like this idea.
On 3/1/08, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> js wrote
Hi,
I noticed that twisted for python2.4 and 2.5 uses different name convension.
I opened new ticket http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14375
Shouldn' they use the same convension?
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosf
+1
On 2/29/08, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> js wrote:
> > I don't think this is not worth the effort.
> > if there were a way to provide instrictions, it would encourages
> > developer to write more messages I suppose.
>
>
> One option
Hi James,
As you know, current apache2 port uses /opt/local/apache2 as a prefix.
This is a bit different from other ports using /opt/local as a prefix.
This problem always confused me, so I think it would be nice if
it changed to use the same prefix.
This change, however, would need a lot of work,
> Before anyone does anything, I'd like to know why you want this
> change.
Consistency, period.
When I upgraded from apache1 to apache2, it surprized me that
there is no conf dir in /opt/local/etc and apachectl is in
/opt/local/apache2/bin/.
> Let's figure out the pros and cons.
>
> A con woul
> >> The apache port should be able to coexist with either the apache2 or
> >> the apache20 port. Currently, they cannot coexist:
> >>
> >> $ sudo port activate apache
> >> Password:
> >> ---> Activating apache
> >> Error: port activate failed: Image error: /opt/local/share/man/man1/
Then, is my request rejected?
Who has the power to decide this kind of issue?
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 29, 2008, at 14:33, Kevin Ballard wrote:
>
> > On Feb 29, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >&
Hi,
I wrote the Filename hierarchy standard for MacPorts.
I know there's already porthier(7), but I thought it would be nice
to have more specific standard.
As you can see, this standard is still incomplete intentionally,
becauses this kind of task should be not done in solely and
I'd like to chec
> > I wrote the Filename hierarchy standard for MacPorts.
> > I know there's already porthier(7), but I thought it would be nice
> > to have more specific standard.
>
> So is this meant to replace porthier(7)? Than you should write it up as
> a patch for the manual page. I don't think we need
> > BSDs save system-specific data like locate.database here.
> > might be good place to put macports dir.
>
> var/macports moved from var/db/dports in the DarwinPorts -> MacPorts
> rename effort.
Any reason?
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-de
> The hier part of the guide is meant to provide the source for the
> porthier.7 man page. It doesn't right now, but we are intending to base
> all manpages on the guide very shortly, so changing the guide is how to
> get the man pages changed. Right now the guide has the most up-to-date
> i
Apparently more people like this change.
I'll get back to trac ticket and start working on this.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:39 AM, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thanks for thorough explanation. That makes sense.
> > > The reason why I started this discuss
> js wrote:
> > Let's say I just installed mysql5 and apache2.
> >
> > Where's the configuration files?
> > for mysq5, It's located in ${prefix}/etc/mysql5 by default.
> > for apache2 ${prefix}/apache2/conf/ by default.
> >
> &g
BTW, Twisted Web2 is still under development and
recommend using svn trunk until next release.
So I assume there're not so many people using twisted web2 port.
I think now is the time to fix this portname.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:27 PM, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then,
More people apparently agreed this change.
I attached the fix below.
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14375
Closing this discussion.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:55 PM, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, Twisted Web2 is still under development and
> recommend usi
Hi,
I've just thought it would be very convenient to have Portfile skelton
generator in base MacPorts system.
The generator would works this way.
Let's say I wanted to add a new port named foo.
$ port skelton foo 1.0 > Portfile
The content of Portfile would looks like
# -*- coding: utf-8; mode
some of
its standard modules and
add them as dependencies, but I doubt you would like this idea.
Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Derek Harland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/03/2008, at 8:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 00:22
> To lower this risk, I could resign python24 port to separate some of
sorry, another typo
s/resign/redesign/
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
> Yes, that may be confusing. But it seems that your solution is to
> make everyone that runs a port upgrade python24 discover they don't
> have zlib anymore. Thats all I'm pointing out.
That would be avoidable without any hassle.
depend_lib or ui_msg?
> It also presumably involves you runn
Hi,
ccache really saves so much time, but it is off by default.
Assuming this is just because MacPorts installer does not contain ccache,
how about adding ccache into the installer and making configurecache
on by default?
I think this would help many users who don't know about ccache, just
like I
> Currently enabling ccache sets CC="ccache /usr/bin/gcc-4.0"
>
> Unfortunately some of the ports don't build with that setting,
> trying to use ccache as the compiler or otherwise not working.
> Even though it is easy to override with "configure.ccache=no",
> it's probably a good idea to leav
ROTECTED]> wrote:
> js wrote:
> > If I add zlib dependency to python24, I'd also add it to python25.
>
> But if you you add it as dependency, what is the benefit from putting it
> in its own port?
>
> Rainer
>
___
tions:
1. Change python24 to drop standard mods just as python25 does.
2. Don't change anything.
3. 1+add dropped mods to python24 and python25 as dependencies
I like the first one.
How about you?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:08 PM, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The benefit i
75 matches
Mail list logo
