On 06/10/16 14:57, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2016-10-06 14:28, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
If there are easy ways to rewrite the history of a pull request, by all means,
let's suggest the user do that, and provide instructions for how to do so. I
have no idea how to do it.
You can rewrite the source
Hello David,
I've only tested on Linux via ssh -X and don't see this. I'll try with
Xquartz. I'm testing on 10.11. If that works, I guess there's a missing
dep. Which platform are you testing on?
Russell
On 30/09/16 18:59, MacPorts wrote:
#52246: Portfile for l3afpad (GTK+ 3 fork of
Hi all,
Could someone review and commit https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52246
please?
Russell
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Hi Javier,
grep -ril startupitem.executable
/opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports/
| xargs less
suggests that sudo -u is the way to do it if a program doesn't know how
to drop privileges. If that doesn't work, I guess several ports have the
same problem
On 11/08/16 16:36, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Lawrence Velázquez
> wrote:
Which is unexpected to say the least. It's because "os" gets
hijacked as a variable name, around line 440:
And I have another
On 20/06/16 10:43, Rainer Müller wrote:
Furthermore, back to the topic of Snappy packages, I recommend to read
this post by Kyle Keen. He describes how distributions adapt software to
the needs of their users. This mostly also applies to MacPorts, as we
often have to patch software to make it
I wonder if SIP could be used by MacPorts to ensure the files in the
directory match what the ports specify (and what would need to be added
to Portfiles to have sufficient information to do this).
Russell
On 18/06/16 07:00, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
MacPorts has to keep reminding software
Hi Abdulrahman,
Do you mean this Z3? https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3 It appears to be MIT
licensed.
Russell
On 29/03/16 00:22, Abdulrahman Alshammari wrote:
I can do a port of this tool but I am wondering about the copyright
issue. I will search on this situation.
Thanks Ryan
Another solution would be a PR with a patch for
https://github.com/python/docsbuild-scripts/blob/master/build_docs.py to
add versions, I guess.
Russell
On 08/01/16 09:11, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 8 January 2016 at 01:47, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 7, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Eric A. Borisch
On 06/01/16 23:44, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 6, 2016, at 4:44 AM, Russell Jones wrote:
I was thinking you might use git+https://github.com/python/cpython.git/Doc with
a set checkout id using the GitHub PortGroup, but that would require building
the docs.
How about using https
On 07/01/16 16:17, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Jan 7, 2016, at 5:53 AM, Russell Jones <russell.jo...@physics.ox.ac.uk>
wrote:
On Daniel's point: checking an SSL cert provides a guarantee from some
certificate issuer, given a competent sysadmin, etc, that the host name matches
it.
Wh
On 07/01/16 16:44, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Russell Jones <russell.jo...@physics.ox.ac.uk>
wrote:
On 07/01/16 16:17, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Jan 7, 2016, at 5:53 AM, Russell Jones <russell.jo...@physics.ox.ac.uk>
wrote:
On Daniel's point: checking
I was thinking you might use
git+https://github.com/python/cpython.git/Doc with a set checkout id
using the GitHub PortGroup, but that would require building the docs.
How about using https://docs.python.org and relying on python.org's SSL
cert to ensure the integrity rather than the MacPorts
You may also be interested in the pypi2port contrib. I've not started
using it much yet, but I'm planning to at some point.
sudo port install py27-progressbar
svn co https://svn.macports.org/repository/macports/contrib/pypi2port/
Russell
On 25/09/15 13:03, Tiago Freitas Pereira wrote:
Ah, I
On 22/05/15 09:57, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
... different updating schemes that would allow the user to select between
always having the latest version of everything, and something that provides
more long-term stability. But then I'm not even sure if Debian/Ubuntu really
allow the user to
On 22/05/15 13:36, Rainer Müller wrote:
What if a port flagged stable depends on an unstable port?
Then that would be a port bug, provided it did so to the exclusion of
depending on a stable package. If a stable and an unstable port were
installed together, that would be a misconfigured or
Is X11 only used for rendering graphics? If so
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13067751/how-to-run-r-scripts-on-servers-without-x11
suggests using
options(bitmapType='cairo')
Could this be set in a config file, in an env var or as a CL parameter
during build?
Russell
On 16/02/15 13:34,
On 15/12/14 09:38, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
For comparison: while theoretically possible, it's generally not
advised to update an Ubuntu or Debian release by simply changing the
repository definitions and letting apt figure things out. R.
Actually, Ubuntu provide do-release-upgrade (and a GUI
Perhaps the installer should offer to add the path if (the most recent) MacTeX
is installed? That won't cover all cases, but could save some people a lot of
time.
From: macports-dev-boun...@lists.macosforge.org
[macports-dev-boun...@lists.macosforge.org]
Hello,
Could the patch in https://trac.macports.org/ticket/30323 be applied, please?
Inkscape still crashes as described in https://trac.macports.org/ticket/29689
(when compiled +universal at least, and I'd think even if not as the bug is
reportedly related to the 64-bit platform)
Russell
.
From: Russell Jones
Sent: 23 August 2011 09:23
To: macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
Subject: Inkscape patch
Hello,
Could the patch in https://trac.macports.org/ticket/30323 be applied, please?
Inkscape still crashes as described in https://trac.macports.org/ticket/29689
(when compiled
Which I suppose is a shortening of tentative use retaining directories or
some contrived reverse-engineered acronym play like that.
From: macports-dev-boun...@lists.macosforge.org
[macports-dev-boun...@lists.macosforge.org] on behalf of Jeremy Lavergne
Hello all,
These two packages conflict, but as far as I can see it's because they have a
same-named file. It looks like they both have the same subsidiary build. Could
something be renamed, or the build be moved out to another port? Neither has a
maintainer, otherwise I'd ask them this... is
I don't know if there's a policy, but kile-kde4 would seem like a more
descriptive name. I can't really find any port names of that form, though.
Alternatively kile21, (like python25. emacs22, etc)
Russell
From: macports-dev-boun...@lists.macosforge.org
Is there any reason the GraphTool Portfile is provided separately and not
included in MacPorts?
http://projects.skewed.de/graph-tool/wiki/GraphToolDownload
Russell
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
But it *is* the 21st century and I most definitely am interested
in seeing Lion sandboxing, just like everyone else is waiting.
I wonder if it will be possible to convert SELinux and/or AppArmor profiles to
the system Lion will use. Has there been any public indication of how Apple are
That is neither a good or bad thing that its impossible to convert.
I'm not sure on what basis you conclude it's impossible, though you're likely
right.
It is not a really, really bad thing, no, but it does mean that we can't make
use a load of work that's already been done in terms of
The other reason for platform independence, I guess, is that it helps OS X
version independence, i.e. with future versions that may drop features MP
depends on.
Russell
- Original Message -
From: Anders F Björklund [mailto:a...@macports.org]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 10:29 AM
To:
From: macports-users-boun...@lists.macosforge.org
[macports-users-boun...@lists.macosforge.org] on behalf of Brandon S Allbery
KF8NH [allber...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 March 2011 17:32
To: macports-us...@lists.macosforge.org
Subject: Re: perl5, perl5.* changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I've just started John Calcote's Autotools (
http://nostarch.com/autotools.htm ), which looks as though it'll be excellent,
and I had the idea that macports could have a command that would detect the
configuration toolset in use in the distfile for a port, e.g. autotools, scons,
cmake, etc,
OK, will supply log/-d output.
Russell
- Original Message -
From: MacPorts [mailto:nore...@macports.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 03:09 AM
To: Russell Jones; te.picker...@macports.org te.picker...@macports.org
Cc: macports-tick...@lists.macosforge.org
macports-tick
I haven't installed anything but macports and /Applications type stuff but I'll
have a look. It seems to be part of gcc from a quick look on Google.
Russell
- Original Message -
From: MacPorts [mailto:nore...@macports.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 08:20 PM
To: Russell Jones
Does CPAN keep older versions? Is it just a build description like Macports, or
are files supplied too?
Russell
---BeginMessage---
On Jul 20, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
It would be fascinating if this functionality could be added to MacPorts,
forming a direct gateway for CPAN
Erm, perhaps I misread the debug output. Will have a look tomorrow.
R
- Original Message -
From: MacPorts nore...@macports.org
To: Russell Jones; macports-tick...@lists.macosforge.org
macports-tick...@lists.macosforge.org
Sent: Thu Jul 01 19:46:39 2010
Subject: Re: [MacPorts] #25485
Hello all,
I'm working on a openssh local port to add some custom changes, and I
wanted to add them as a patch. Thus I wanted to check for clashes with
the patches that come with the port, but none seem to be applied: port
-d patch openssh gives no output. Is this how things should be, or have
Joshua Root wrote:
Source code and disk images for MacPorts 1.9.0-beta2 are now
available [1]. Testing of either of these install methods is helpful.
While there are no known regressions from 1.8.2 at this point, be
prepared to encounter bugs. Please report any that you find [2] (after
first
TCL isn't really a barrier to port development. It's mostly just used for
key-value paris. If anything Ruby creates the danger of people who know Ruby
overcomplexifying the package definition files because they can.
That doesn't apply to core, though.
Russell
---BeginMessage---
On Mon, May 17,
for those who want to type the minimum.
Russell
---BeginMessage---
Russell Jones russell.jo...@physics.ox.ac.uk wrote:
Andrea D'Amore wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Rainer Müller rai...@macports.org wrote:
The only thing for me would be 'rdeps' vs. 'deps --recursive
Andrea D'Amore wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Rainer Müller rai...@macports.org wrote:
The only thing for me would be 'rdeps' vs. 'deps --recursive' (or the
abbreviated version 'deps --r'). But I guess that only bothers me, so
just leave it as it is now :-)
Meaning that in
39 matches
Mail list logo