Re: RFC: Python maintenance policy

2014-09-25 Thread Eric Gallager
Maybe not new py24-foo or new py25-foo ports, but what about +python24 or +python25 variants for ordinary ports that have python bindings? For example, this isn't the port itself, but from reading the upstream gdb mailing lists, it looks like gdb upstream actually extended their support for python

Re: RFC: Python maintenance policy

2014-09-23 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Lawrence Velázquez lar...@macports.org wrote: == POLICY == […] The policy is informally half in place, noone is actually creating new py24-foo or py25-bar (or at least I hope soo), that said I'm glad to see old py* ports being phased out. This could be

Re: RFC: Python maintenance policy

2014-09-23 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Sean Farley s...@macports.org wrote: it's because of Python 3 screwing up the treatment of unicode strings. sarcasm It's spelled improved. /sarcasm I'm liking py3 insofar. -- Andrea ___ macports-dev mailing list

Re: RFC: Python maintenance policy

2014-09-23 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Sean Farley s...@macports.org wrote: I actually have the back story for this from the last PyCon. Suffice to say, it's because of Python 3 screwing up the treatment of unicode strings. Huh. I'd assumed arm-twisting from Red Hat, possibly with an education

Re: RFC: Python maintenance policy

2014-09-23 Thread Sean Farley
Brandon Allbery writes: On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Sean Farley s...@macports.org wrote: I actually have the back story for this from the last PyCon. Suffice to say, it's because of Python 3 screwing up the treatment of unicode strings. Huh. I'd assumed arm-twisting from Red Hat,

Re: RFC: Python maintenance policy

2014-09-23 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Sep 23, 2014, at 3:49 AM, Andrea D'Amore and.dam...@macports.org wrote: The policy is informally half in place, noone is actually creating new py24-foo or py25-bar (or at least I hope soo) Yup. Most of it really is just common sense. I just want to formalize it for the future, so we have

Re: RFC: Python maintenance policy

2014-09-23 Thread Christoph Deil
On 23 Sep 2014, at 04:46, Lawrence Velázquez lar...@macports.org wrote: Maintaining old versions of CPython that aren't supported upstream is annoying and a poor use of our time, so I'd like to propose a maintenance policy. After we chit-chat about it, I'll write something up on the wiki

RFC: Python maintenance policy

2014-09-22 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
Maintaining old versions of CPython that aren't supported upstream is annoying and a poor use of our time, so I'd like to propose a maintenance policy. After we chit-chat about it, I'll write something up on the wiki (hopefully a little clearer) and inform macports-users. The term replaced by

Re: RFC: Python maintenance policy

2014-09-22 Thread Sean Farley
Lawrence Velázquez writes: Maintaining old versions of CPython that aren't supported upstream is annoying and a poor use of our time, so I'd like to propose a maintenance policy. After we chit-chat about it, I'll write something up on the wiki (hopefully a little clearer) and inform