Re: Why is one compiler on 10.6 able to generate PPC binaries and not the other?

2016-03-11 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 02:14, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > Hi, > > A few more questions: > > (1) If I want to target 10.5 from 10.6 I probably need libmacho and > libunwind as well? What about these lines from libcxxabi? Are they > most likely needed or not? > >

Re: Why is one compiler on 10.6 able to generate PPC binaries and not the other?

2016-03-11 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 01:50, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > On 11 March 2016 at 09:35, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: >>> On Mar 10, 2016, at 17:20, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> On 10 March 2016 at 21:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 10, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

Re: Why is one compiler on 10.6 able to generate PPC binaries and not the other?

2016-03-11 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hi, A few more questions: (1) If I want to target 10.5 from 10.6 I probably need libmacho and libunwind as well? What about these lines from libcxxabi? Are they most likely needed or not? pre-build { system "nm -g ${prefix}/lib/libmacho.a 2> /dev/null | grep ' \[DST\] ' |

Re: Why is one compiler on 10.6 able to generate PPC binaries and not the other?

2016-03-11 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 11 March 2016 at 09:35, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: >> On Mar 10, 2016, at 17:20, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> On 10 March 2016 at 21:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 10, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hi, While following

Re: Why is one compiler on 10.6 able to generate PPC binaries and not the other?

2016-03-11 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> On Mar 10, 2016, at 17:20, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > On 10 March 2016 at 21:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> On Mar 10, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> While following >>> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/LibcxxOnOlderSystems#Leopardppc >>> on

Re: Why is one compiler on 10.6 able to generate PPC binaries and not the other?

2016-03-10 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> on 10.6/x86_64 I tried to install clang 3.7 (thinking that version 3.7 > >> might have an even better support for PPC than 3.6). I just noticed this... my own assumption would be that, as availability of PPC test

Re: Why is one compiler on 10.6 able to generate PPC binaries and not the other?

2016-03-10 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 10 March 2016 at 21:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On Mar 10, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> While following >>https://trac.macports.org/wiki/LibcxxOnOlderSystems#Leopardppc >> on 10.6/x86_64 I tried to install clang 3.7 (thinking that version 3.7 >> might have an even

Re: Why is one compiler on 10.6 able to generate PPC binaries and not the other?

2016-03-10 Thread Ryan Schmidt
> On Mar 10, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > Hi, > > While following >https://trac.macports.org/wiki/LibcxxOnOlderSystems#Leopardppc > on 10.6/x86_64 I tried to install clang 3.7 (thinking that version 3.7 > might have an even better support for PPC than

Why is one compiler on 10.6 able to generate PPC binaries and not the other?

2016-03-10 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hi, While following https://trac.macports.org/wiki/LibcxxOnOlderSystems#Leopardppc on 10.6/x86_64 I tried to install clang 3.7 (thinking that version 3.7 might have an even better support for PPC than 3.6). The problem is that clang-mp-3.7 doesn't want to produce ppc binaries, so I wasn't