Re: port search --maintainer[s]

On 2017-03-30 23:44, Jan Stary wrote: > On Mar 30 21:06:59, rai...@macports.org wrote: >> On 03/30/2017 06:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote: >>> This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8. >>> The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintainers', >>> but the guide says '--maintainer' and

Re: GSOC Application

On 03/31/2017 12:08 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Would the buildbots upload the tarballs to the MacPorts mirrors? Yes, that is the idea. It will not even require anything special on the buildbots, as just running the usual 'sudo port fetch' will generate this tarball after fetching from VCS.

Re: GSoC'17: Add migrate action to port command Project

> On Mar 30, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Clemens Lang wrote: > > Hey everybody, > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:37:55PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >>> On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Umesh Singla wrote: >> >> Does the migrate and snapshot actions help you

Re: GSOC Application

Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla) > On Mar 30, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > Hello, > > On 03/30/2017 04:04 PM, Chinmaya Bhat wrote: >> I am Chinmaya, a third-year Computer Science student at BMSIT, Bangalore. I >> am >> new to MacPorts. I can code

Re: port search --maintainer[s]

On Mar 30 21:06:59, rai...@macports.org wrote: > On 03/30/2017 06:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote: > > This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8. > > The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintainers', > > but the guide says '--maintainer' and '--maintainer' > > while port-search.1 only says

Re: port livecheck does not find new mandoc

On Mar 31 04:49:02, j...@macports.org wrote: > On 2017-3-31 03:41 , Jan Stary wrote: > > This is 2.4.99 running on 10.6.8 > > > > port -d livecheck mandoc does not find > > http://mdocml.bsd.lv/snapshots/mdocml-1.14.1.tar.gz > > because it looks for "mandoc-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*)" > > i.e. the tarball

Re: GSoC'17: Add migrate action to port command Project

Hi cal, ijackson Thanks for reviewing my proposal and providing a great feedback. I've replied to most of your comments in the proposal. This surely helps. Please let me know if I have made some false assumption about anything, the timeline/ project plan needs to be modified a great bit or I

Re: manpages is mdoc(7)

On Mar 30 21:47:38, rai...@macports.org wrote: > On 03/30/2017 09:26 PM, Jan Stary wrote: > > Just forget it. My intentions when proposing the mdoc(7) rewrite > > were the opposite of having asciidoc and docbook and xml/xsl ... > > While the dependencies seem quite heavy, (to say the least) >

Re: manpages is mdoc(7)

On 03/30/2017 09:26 PM, Jan Stary wrote: > Just forget it. My intentions when proposing the mdoc(7) rewrite > were the opposite of having asciidoc and docbook and xml/xsl ... While the dependencies seem quite heavy, languages like man(7)/mdoc(7) just fell out of fashion and rarely anyone still

Re: GSOC Application

Hello, On 03/30/2017 04:04 PM, Chinmaya Bhat wrote: > I am Chinmaya, a third-year Computer Science student at BMSIT, Bangalore. I am > new to MacPorts. I can code in C and Python and am going through the Tcl > tutorial on the GSOC wiki. > I have installed MacPorts and am reading the

Re: manpages is mdoc(7)

On Mar 30 19:08:44, h...@stare.cz wrote: > I propose to rewrite them into the _semantic_ markup of mdoc(7) language. On Mar 30 20:59:31, rai...@macports.org wrote: > Our man pages are actually written in AsciiDoc and then converted to the roff > output. We only maintain the generated roff output

Re: manpages is mdoc(7)

Hey, On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:08:44PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > Currently, the port-* manpages are written using the legacy man(7) > language which uses low-level roff constructs to described > presentational details. > > I propose to rewrite them into the _semantic_ markup of mdoc(7) >

Re: GSoC'17: Add migrate action to port command Project

Hey everybody, On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:37:55PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > > On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Umesh Singla wrote: > > Does the migrate and snapshot actions help you divide the work? The > snapshot action is basically an inventory of what is

Re: port search --maintainer[s]

[sending again with correct list address] On 03/30/2017 06:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote: > This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8. > The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintainers', > but the guide says '--maintainer' and '--maintainer' > while port-search.1 only says '--maintainer'.

Re: port livecheck does not find new mandoc

On 2017-3-31 05:10 , Jan Stary wrote: On Mar 30 18:41:26, h...@stare.cz wrote: This is 2.4.99 running on 10.6.8 port -d livecheck mandoc does not find http://mdocml.bsd.lv/snapshots/mdocml-1.14.1.tar.gz because it looks for "mandoc-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*)" i.e. the tarball differs from the port name.

Re: port livecheck does not find new mandoc

On Mar 30 18:41:26, h...@stare.cz wrote: > This is 2.4.99 running on 10.6.8 > > port -d livecheck mandoc does not find > http://mdocml.bsd.lv/snapshots/mdocml-1.14.1.tar.gz > because it looks for "mandoc-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*)" > i.e. the tarball differs from the port name. > What is the right place to

Re: manpages is mdoc(7)

Err, the intended subject was "manpages in mdoc(7)" :-) But yes, manpages is mdoc(7), imho. On Mar 30 19:08:44, h...@stare.cz wrote: > Currently, the port-* manpages are written > using the legacy man(7) language which uses > low-level roff constructs to described presentational details. > > I

manpages is mdoc(7)

Currently, the port-* manpages are written using the legacy man(7) language which uses low-level roff constructs to described presentational details. I propose to rewrite them into the _semantic_ markup of mdoc(7) language. Both have been around for decades and are well supported by groff. As an

Re: port search --maintainer[s]

(Sorry, attaching now). On Mar 30 18:18:41, h...@stare.cz wrote: > This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8. > The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintainers', > but the guide says '--maintainer' and '--maintainer' > while port-search.1 only says '--maintainer'. > Attached please

port livecheck does not find new mandoc

This is 2.4.99 running on 10.6.8 port -d livecheck mandoc does not find http://mdocml.bsd.lv/snapshots/mdocml-1.14.1.tar.gz because it looks for "mandoc-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*)" i.e. the tarball differs from the port name. What is the right place to specify the right regex? Jan

port search --maintainer[s]

This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8. The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintainers', but the guide says '--maintainer' and '--maintainer' while port-search.1 only says '--maintainer'. Attached please find a diff for each. There is also port-search.1.txt in git, which gets