On 2017-12-24 08:40 , Eitan Adler wrote:
> In macports base in standard_configure.sh
>
> there is this line:
> 6 env PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin CFLAGS="-pipe -Os"
> ./configure --enable-readline
>
> Why do we compile with -Os instead of -O2?
>
> As far as I could the only difference,
In macports base in standard_configure.sh
there is this line:
6 env PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin CFLAGS="-pipe -Os"
./configure --enable-readline
Why do we compile with -Os instead of -O2?
As far as I could the only difference, in llvm 4.0.1, is to disable
the "libcalls-shrinkwrap" opt
On 2017-12-24 04:28 , Clemens Lang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 12:39:34PM +0100, Vincent Habchi wrote:
>> I’ve a made a private change to my python27 Portfile to allow it to
>> use DB60 instead of the default DB48, which was installed only for its
>> needs. I think allowing people
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 12:39:34PM +0100, Vincent Habchi wrote:
> I’ve a made a private change to my python27 Portfile to allow it to
> use DB60 instead of the default DB48, which was installed only for its
> needs. I think allowing people (through a variant) to build a Python
> 2.7 version
can you add environment variables to "use_autoconf"?
some of these autogen.sh scripts automatically run configure if you don't set
one.
K
> On Dec 23, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Should we add a "use_autogen" (or "use_autogen_sh") option to MacPorts
Should we add a "use_autogen" (or "use_autogen_sh") option to MacPorts base?
We already have "use_autoconf", "use_automake" and "use_autoreconf". Each of
these add the autoconf, automake, libtool dependencies, and set up the right
command to run before the configure phase.
But many projects
On Dec 23, 2017, at 01:15, Enrico Maria Crisostomo wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec (mojca) pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/ba175af7fc6e712f4455a5472ffb77191f8243b0
>
> The following commit(s) were added to
On Dec 19, 2017, at 08:23, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> On 2017-12-20 01:09 , Rainer Müller wrote:
>> On 2017-12-18 00:20, Clemens Lang wrote:
>>> We debugged this on IRC recently. Turns out the culprit is
>>>
>>>
Hi there,
I’ve a made a private change to my python27 Portfile to allow it to use DB60
instead of the default DB48, which was installed only for its needs. I think
allowing people (through a variant) to build a Python 2.7 version which relies
on another version of DB would be nice.
Happy Xmas