Hi all,
I want to remind everyone about when you should increase a port's revision and
when you should not. Please don't increase revisions unnecessarily because it
wastes time on our build servers and on users systems.
You SHOULD increase a port's revision if a user who already has the port
On Jun 25, 2020, at 18:06, Michael wrote:
> That's 10.15, that requires the root drive reformatting, with no compatible
> driver for older systems, right?
>
> (Whether or not it's a better file system isn't the issue. 100% breaking
> compatibility with everything older is a bad move.)
Huh? On
On 2020-06-25, at 3:52 PM, Perry Lee wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 3:32 PM, Michael wrote:
>> (Apple's software license says I can run it on Mac hardware, right? It
>> doesn't say that it has to be the raw OS, does it?)
>
> From the software license agreement for macOS Catalina [1]: "to
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 14:48, macpo...@parvis.nl wrote:
> after my development mac mini died (and the time backup appeared to be
> corrupt) i had to buy another mac.
> now i have a 2013 imac that can run catalina, but sometimes i also need
> 10.11 for older hardware and software, and 10.13
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 3:32 PM, Michael wrote:
> (Apple's software license says I can run it on Mac hardware, right? It
> doesn't say that it has to be the raw OS, does it?)
>From the software license agreement for macOS Catalina [1]: "to install, use
>and run up to two (2) additional copies
On 2020-06-25, at 3:03 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * macpo...@parvis.nl:
>
>> i would like these 10.11 and 10.13 as vm guest under 10.15.
>
> Why as a VM guest? Have you considered installing and booting different
> macOS versions on separate partitions of the same machine? You can even
>
If I wanted to run a vm of something at 10.12 or newer, on a host running
10.9.5, is it doable?
If not: How well does 10.9.5 run as a guest on newer OS's?
Keep in mind: 10.9.5 was really the last "low security sandbox", and newer OS's
restrict things. 10.9.5 was the last "old audio model"
* macpo...@parvis.nl:
> i would like these 10.11 and 10.13 as vm guest under 10.15.
Why as a VM guest? Have you considered installing and booting different
macOS versions on separate partitions of the same machine? You can even
install macOS on external harddisks.
Another option I find
> after my development mac mini died (and the time backup appeared to be
> corrupt) i had to buy another mac.
> now i have a 2013 imac that can run catalina, but sometimes i also need 10.11
> for older hardware and software, and 10.13 for compatibilty with our other
> macs.
>
> i would like
after my development mac mini died (and the time backup appeared to be corrupt)
i had to buy another mac.
now i have a 2013 imac that can run catalina, but sometimes i also need 10.11
for older hardware and software, and 10.13 for compatibilty with our other macs.
i would like these 10.11 and
10 matches
Mail list logo
