Re: "cask" ports just keep on rolling in...

2021-02-06 Thread Ken Cunningham
although I was concerned about getting this pattern right before we had too many of these to fix, it does seem the admins feel there's really no issue to worry about here. So I guess we just open the gate and let them in. There is no recommendation for a requirement for a naming convention or

Re: "cask" ports just keep on rolling in...

2021-02-06 Thread Mark Anderson
Yeah, it seems like a lot of the stuff is in place, but we just need some tweaks. I like the idea of a portgroup like BinaryOnly or something, but what else needs to happen? I'd be more than happy to help, what needs to be done? Should we maybe take to Trac to get a to-do and proposal going?

Re: FileZilla: current version requires SDK 11

2021-02-06 Thread Mark Anderson
I would maybe have one of us try it for 11.0 and if < 11 is detected the latest pre macOS 11 build is done. I do that for iTerm - i have had some problems recently but it mostly worked. —Mark On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 12:55 PM Lothar Haeger wrote: > The latest version of FileZilla fails to build

FileZilla: current version requires SDK 11

2021-02-06 Thread Lothar Haeger
The latest version of FileZilla fails to build on my Catalina system and the developer states, it requires the latest BigSur SDK to compile (though the final binary should be running on macOS 10.11 and newer): → https://trac.filezilla-project.org/ticket/12358 If I understand that

Re: "cask" ports just keep on rolling in...

2021-02-06 Thread Ken Cunningham
true, without ever trying it, you couldn't know

Re: "cask" ports just keep on rolling in...

2021-02-06 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 6, 2021, at 09:17, Ken Cunningham wrote: > those are the small things. > > I stopped when the broad strokes, as it is now, were a unworkable disaster. I don't understand which aspects are an unworkable disaster. As I said, based on what you've said so far, it seems like everything

Re: "cask" ports just keep on rolling in...

2021-02-06 Thread Ken Cunningham
those are the small things. I stopped when the broad strokes, as it is now, were a unworkable disaster. K

Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failing

2021-02-06 Thread Craig Treleaven
> On Feb 6, 2021, at 4:47 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > > On Feb 6, 2021, at 02:14, Ken Cunningham wrote: > >> On Feb 5, 2021, at 10:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >>> That sounds like what Craig is saying: that meson is now adding a compiler >>> flag that old compilers don't understand.

Re: "cask" ports just keep on rolling in...

2021-02-06 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 6, 2021, at 04:15, Ken Cunningham wrote: > try the sagemath one if you like. It's all set, for a newish system at > present: > > https://github.com/kencu/myports/blob/master/binary/sagemath-binary/Portfile > > It is a stress test, for sure -- and I fully admit you may know simple

Re: "cask" ports just keep on rolling in...

2021-02-06 Thread Ken Cunningham
try the sagemath one if you like. It's all set, for a newish system at present: https://github.com/kencu/myports/blob/master/binary/sagemath-binary/Portfile It is a stress test, for sure -- and I fully admit you may know simple tweaks to make it much more efficient. Ken

Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failing

2021-02-06 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 6, 2021, at 02:14, Ken Cunningham wrote: > On Feb 5, 2021, at 10:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> That sounds like what Craig is saying: that meson is now adding a compiler >> flag that old compilers don't understand. Meson should check whether a >> compiler supports a flag before it

Re: "cask" ports just keep on rolling in...

2021-02-06 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 6, 2021, at 02:28, Ken Cunningham wrote: >>> This kind of port just repackages the DMG into many tgz archives. >>> >>> It’s wasteful. People want them. >>> >>> What we should have instead of this is some kinda tech that >>> >>> 1. downloads the DMG >>> 2. installs the app >>> 3. records

Re: "cask" ports just keep on rolling in...

2021-02-06 Thread Ken Cunningham
> On Feb 5, 2021, at 10:00 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > > On Feb 5, 2021, at 13:00, Ken Cunningham wrote: > >> With no plan, we’ll just keep getting more and more of these. > > I'm not aware of a huge influx of these, but I'm also not really paying > attention to the PR queue. And I'm

Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failing

2021-02-06 Thread Ken Cunningham
> On Feb 5, 2021, at 10:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > That sounds like what Craig is saying: that meson is now adding a compiler > flag that old compilers don't understand. Meson should check whether a > compiler supports a flag before it adds it. We should not be responsible for > fixing