Hi,
>
> With modern macOS and modern hardware there are performance effects that
> you can't control, perhaps most significantly thermal throttling, but
> also background jobs like Time Machine backups and iCloud sync.
>
> You need to apply a little bit of statistical theory. Standard error
>
On 2019-6-13 16:40 , Mihir Luthra wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would like to see the time for each run (if 10 runs, then 10 columns
> i.e., xx_run1, xx_run2, ...), rather than only average of them.
>
> Collect as much as insights we could, maybe we find some pattern or
> something that
Hi,
>
> Not necessary to stick to 10 runs, just because I said so. It can be
> even 3 or 5 runs. Whichever you feel seem to be good enough to give
> some insights. E.g., you might feel that after 3 runs you are getting
> constant time and not much difference, in another case you might get
> all
Hi Mihir,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:40 AM Mihir Luthra <1999mihir.lut...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>
>> I would like to see the time for each run (if 10 runs, then 10 columns
>> i.e., xx_run1, xx_run2, ...), rather than only average of them.
>>
>> Collect as much as insights we could, maybe we
Hi,
> I would like to see the time for each run (if 10 runs, then 10 columns
> i.e., xx_run1, xx_run2, ...), rather than only average of them.
>
> Collect as much as insights we could, maybe we find some pattern or
> something that might help us (not sure what though). Since I have a
> feeling,
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 6:01 PM Mihir Luthra <1999mihir.lut...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi jan,
>
>>
>> How exactly were these numbers obtained? Is it one run?
>> An average of ten runs? All following a complete distclean?
>> Is it the "real" time as reported by time(1) or somethin else?
>> What are
Hi,
> This is certainly an improvement. How does it compare with running the
> same builds without trace mode? The ideal scenario would of course be to
> have trace mode incur only a barely noticeable performance penalty.
>
Kindly check out this link. I made the comparisons again for those
Hi jan,
> How exactly were these numbers obtained? Is it one run?
> An average of ten runs? All following a complete distclean?
> Is it the "real" time as reported by time(1) or somethin else?
> What are the other times reported by time(1), as in
>
> $ time sleep 5
> 0m05.01s real
On 2019-6-7 06:38 , Mihir Luthra wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been working on trace mode optimisation project.
> I have added the functionalities to improve the speed. [1]
> I tested it on some ports, and it works stably.
>
> Here are some comparisons I made on my machine:
>
> In Original
Hi everyone,
I have been working on trace mode optimisation project.
I have added the functionalities to improve the speed. [1]
I tested it on some ports, and it works stably.
Here are some comparisons I made on my machine:
In Original Code
Port gettext (+ deps :ncurses, libiconv, gperf) : 13
10 matches
Mail list logo
