* Ryan Schmidt:
> I wasn't aware that discussions on the mailing list were difficult to
> access.
I don't think they are difficult to access, if one is using a suitable
setup. Personally, I use Notmuch (https://notmuchmail.org) specifically
for all my mailing list subscriptions, with my IMAP
I agree with Ryan. Centralization on a less than optimal system is better
than fragmenting the communication on "cool systems".
My way of finding things in the list: using Google with the modifier `site:
lists.macports.org`. (I guess I'm not the only one)
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 12:57 AM Ryan
On May 1, 2021, at 17:46, Gregory Anders wrote:
> One potential solution might be something like public-inbox.org [1]. This
> would provide an easy-to-access archive without fragmenting discussion
> further.
Why would an archive created with public inbox be easier to use than the
archives
> On May 1, 2021, at 4:23 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2021, at 14:08, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
>> For some of our more long running discussions should we try and leverage
>> GitHub’s discussion feature? I know that for instance the past Perl
>> discussion and the Binary only
On Apr 30, 2021, at 14:08, Mark Anderson wrote:
> For some of our more long running discussions should we try and leverage
> GitHub’s discussion feature? I know that for instance the past Perl
> discussion and the Binary only discussion can be hard to wade through on the
> list. Might be a
